search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CAUSECAUSE


It is widely accepted that the reason for the increase is/was due to the arrival of Uber. Whether this increase was beneficial to the residents of Lewes district is a matter of personal judgement.


It is a fact that when Uber applied for the renewal of its short-term Brighton & Hove operators licence in 2018, it advertised on its website to potential drivers that they should go to Lewes DC to gain licences to work in Brighton & Hove. This was on the basis that Brighton & Hove has an extensive ‘Knowledge Test’ where as the Lewes DC knowledge test is much easier which would make any waiting time much shorter.


Effectively going to Lewes for a licence was known to be a quick route to be able to predominantly work in Brighton & Hove.


This was brought to the attention of the Brighton & Hove Licensing Committee at the time of the application at a public meeting. Licensing Panel Member, Green Councillor Lizzie Deane, at the time expressed great concern to Uber for doing this and consequently Uber removed that information from its website to appease the council.


Lewes DC then had a major increase of 170% of vehicle licences being issued which shows in the chart for the 2018/19 period and has increased exponentially.


HOWEVER….HOWEVER....


It is notoriously well known that the vast majority of drivers who gain a Lewes private hire driver/vehicle licence have no intention of working in the Lewes district area. In fact, most of these drivers/vehicles predominantly work outside of the Lewes district, and mostly in the city of Brighton & Hove.


Whilst this is not illegal, it is certainly not in the spirit of the law and public safety but is fully encouraged by Uber. This practice obviously discourages drivers from gaining a licence in Brighton & Hove and flies in the face of legislators and their desire for “localism” as has been stated in various case law.


To date, we have provided over 130 reports of Lewes drivers/vehicles contravening respective licensing conditions, such as missing rear licence plates and or


66


missing repeater door licence plates, which still continues to this day.


Additionally, we have Lewes DC private hire drivers/vehicles using Brighton & Hove taxi ranks which have been reported to Brighton & Hove Licensing to take action.


What reason is there to reduce the requirement for a Lewes private hire licence application?


FACTS AND FIGURES FACTS AND FIGURES


Facts show that an applicant for a Lewes DC private hire driver/vehicle licence indicates that there is no intention to work within the Lewes licensing authority area, although this is not illegal.


Figures supplied show that there is no decrease in Lewes DC private hire vehicle numbers and with the supplied information shows there is in fact an increase. This is contrary to the misinformation recently published in the press originating from Councillor MacLeod (Lewes DC).


There is however an absolute and clearly documented decrease in Brighton & Hove licensed private hire vehicles.


EFFECT EFFECT


With lower requirements needed to gain a Lewes DC private hire driver/vehicle licence, this has a knock-on effect for the Brighton & Hove Licensing department in reduced applications and reduced revenue for sustainment. Brighton & Hove issues a dual licence for a hackney carriage and private hire driver with the knowledge/route test being exactly the same. This is what Lewes DC currently requires.


OCTOBER 2023 PHTM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82