search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
STATION STIRRINGS


PETERBOROUGH TAXI DRIVERS FEAR FOR FUTURE OVER ISSUES WITH UBER DRIVERS AT STATION


Peterborough’s black cab drivers are raising concerns about the future of their trade. Mahmood Khan, a taxi driver for over 40 years, and fellow cabbie Jake Carter allege that some Uber drivers are flouting regulations by waiting at the city’s railway station without pre-booked fares, effect- ively poaching passengers. The drivers claim Uber vehicles congregate in the station’s pick- up/drop-off area, and even on the access road, during peak hours. This gives arriving passengers the impression that Uber is readily available. While posters have been displayed reminding drivers of the rules, Khan and Carter assert they’ve had no impact.


“Uber has been operating in Peterborough for about six months now. We don’t have a problem with competition. However, some of the things that some drivers are doing is breaching the rules,” said Carter. He highlighted the financial burden placed on black cab drivers, noting: “We have to buy a £2,000 licence every year to be able to operate at the station taxi rank and our taxis are very expensive to buy.” Khan echoed these concerns, stating: “We’re seeing people leave the black cab trade as a result of this. It is becoming increasingly difficult for taxi drivers in Peterborough, with the decline of the night time economy and other things disappearing from the city.”


He also raised safety concerns, adding: “We’re also seeing drivers, dropping people off on the mini- roundabout, blocking the road for everyone, and filling up the pick- up/drop off area while they wait. “It’s very busy in there at peak times, and someone could get injured. There seems to be no penalty for them not breaking rules.” An Uber spokesperson responded, saying: “Any driver found picking up unbooked trips will perm- anently lose access to the app. We regularly remind drivers that they must adhere to Uber’s community guidelines, which includes safely picking up and dropping off passengers in the appropriate areas.”


CHELMSFORD TAXI DRIVERS CHALLENGE PROPOSED BEAULIEU PARK STATION PERMIT CHARGES


Chelmsford City Council is facing opposition from local taxi drivers over plans to


charge them


between £500 to £1,500 for permits to operate at the new Beaulieu Park railway station. The council owns the land allocated for the new taxi rank at the station and says it will manage it accordingly. It aims to limit the number of taxis on the rank, potentially issuing only 50 permits in the first year. There are about 200 black cabs, 100 of which pay £1,200 for permission to use the rank at Chelmsford Station, which Greater Anglia owns. However, Chelmsford Taxi Drivers Association said they believe it is “unjust and unlawful” for a council to profit from the


PHTM MARCH 2025


licensed trade - regardless of where the funds end up. A statement on behalf of Chelms- ford Taxi Drivers Association claimed the council wanted to “double permit” the drivers - saying they already pay to license their vehicles as taxis. The association said: “Any refusal to allow a locally licensed HCV from using a locally adopted taxi rank would be an offence and a complete waste of council funds, and any suggestion otherwise would be, in our opinion, misplaced.” They warned the council could face legal challenges if it proceeds with the proposed charges. The association also expressed concerns that these restrictions


could discourage taxis from operating at the station, compromising public safety and convenience. “Ensuring that sufficient taxis are available to transport the public home safely and promptly should remain a key priority for the council,” the statement emphasised. A council spokesperson stated that permit systems are common at rail stations allowing a limited number of vehicles access. The spokesperson added: “The council’s Regulatory Committee agreed to a six-week consultation regarding the proposal for use of the taxi rank to require a permit. Responses will be brought back to the committee for consideration.”


23


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76