Once again I have to thank you very much for your kind appreciation and the various emails that I’ve received providing tangible confirma- tion from different areas nationally that the problems faced by the trade are fairly universal. Most involve an intrepid bunch of inexperienced

council officers and councillors who insist on meddling in areas of licensing in which they possess absolutely no experi- ence or expertise. What makes matters even worse is that this group seems impervious to any criticism, however construc- tive, and more so time and again they ignore the stark warnings and rational safety arguments of the experienced trade.

With a self-asserted sense of entitlement born of impunity, they continue to spread their (over) regulatory madness in order only (as far as I can see) to impede and prevent respon- sible operators, proprietors and drivers from running a safe and cost effective business. This is of course, the polar oppo- site of what their regulatory role should be! If in doubt, ask the DfT...!

The darker side of this is that some of their ill-conceived and poorly thought out regulatory madness actually places the trade at risk of inherent danger.

This month we examine one such danger, that of the glass hammer or rescue hammer (take your pick). For the uninitiat- ed, they are not made of glass, but instead are constructed from toughened steel. These hammers are exceptionally effective at their proposed purpose, i.e. they will smash or shatter a pane of toughened laminated glass mostly in one blow from the hammer’s ‘needle point’. There are numerous videos on the web which stand testament to this effective- ness. One such video shows a demonstration where with one blow of the hammer, a three inch diameter hole is punched in a half inch thick pane of glass. Imagine in your mind substitut- ing the pane of glass in the demonstration for a driver’s head, in order to appreciate the real potential danger(s) posed.

These are sometimes located on buses and trains for the proper purpose of breaking windows in an emergency. Now it should be stressed here that where these are provided on mass public transport (buses and trains), a number of mitigat- ing circumstances exist and must be considered. In most cases they are provided in passenger compartments that are totally separate to, or are located a long way away from, the driver. For example, on a train the driver is housed totally sep- arate to/from the passengers in a different compartment and


on a bus, the driver is encapsulated in a tough- ened glass or poly- carbonate safety “pod”.

In addition to this, on alter- native forms of mass public transport, there is the added mitigation of what could be called a ‘balance of power’ i.e. if Mr or Mrs Raving Lunatic (who may or may not be heavily intoxicated) were to grab the hammer and decide to attempt to attack the driver, then either this would not be possible as the driver is inaccessible or, any would-be assailant would be taken down by other unrelated passengers on the service. This ‘balance of power’ does not exist in a taxi or private hire vehicle - even when it is an MPV or minibus - as even when a group is travelling together, they are normally related in some way, even by friendship, and are generally of a similar intoxication level to other passengers within their group.

In making these assertions, I probably need to restate my experience and expertise here. Well, I have approaching 35 years experience in the cab trade and also hold a category ‘D’ driving licence for buses and coaches, together with a driver Certificate of Professional Competence (CPC).

Let us now turn to the requirement for these hammers in taxis and private hire vehicles by some Local Authorities. Firstly would it be churlish here to ask for the council officers and licensing councillors to publicly state their experience and expertise!?

In a taxi or private hire vehicle, even an MPV or minibus, the driver is almost always located ‘cheek by jowl’ with the passengers. Incidentally and ironically, where they are not in the same compartment as the driver i.e. purpose built or black cabs for example in London, no such requirement for a ham- mer is made – so what does that say about the reasonableness or necessity of such a requirement in the provinces? Yes, you’ve got it – the ‘Inexperienced Meddlers’ at work once again!

Let us consider the potential and very real scenario of an MPV in use as a hackney carriage, which on a Saturday night picks up five intoxicated youngsters. At some point during the jour- ney, a row erupts over the fare or the route taken or anything else for that matter... what’s to stop one of the intoxicated


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102