ALL THINGS LICENSING
operation, it operates to the standards expected of a taxi or private hire operation.
Safety at the core
It is important, particularly in cases that attract public sympathy, not to lose sight of the fundamental purpose of licensing: protecting passengers.
lift home which is a perfectly lawful and everyday occurrence.
The comparison is understandable but ultimately flawed. Informal lifts are characterised by their spontaneity and their basis in existing relationships. They are private, occasional and not offered to the public at large.
By contrast, the pub landlord’s scheme displayed the hallmarks of a structured transport service. It was predictable, organised and widely available to customers. Over time, it became something people could rely on, rather than a one-off act of kindness.
That distinction is critical. Licensing law does not exist to regulate private generosity. It exists to regulate services offered to the public. Once an activity crosses that threshold, the regulatory framework is engaged.
The significance of presentation
Another important factor is how the service is presented.
The use of a London-style black cab is not merely a cosmetic detail. Such vehicles carry a strong association with licensed transport. To the public, they signal a regulated environment, one in which drivers are vetted, vehicles are inspected, and journeys are insured appropriately.
When a service adopts that appearance and makes itself available to the public, passengers are likely to assume that the usual safeguards apply. If they do not, a disconnect arises between perception and reality.
Licensing exists to close that gap. It ensures that when a service looks like a taxi or private hire
PHTM AUGUST 2026
The requirements placed on drivers and operators, background checks, medical assessments, vehicle inspections, insurance arbitrary hurdles.
provisions, etc. are not
They are safeguards built up over time to ensure that members of the public can travel with confidence.
In the case under discussion, those safeguards were not formally in place. The driver was not licensed as a private hire driver. The vehicle was not licensed for carrying members of the public. There was no operator licence overseeing the activity, nor any guarantee that the insurance arrangements reflected the nature of the use.
Even where the individual involved is entirely trustworthy, licensing cannot rely on personal assurances. It must operate on consistent, verifiable standards.
The wider impact on the trade There is also a question of fairness.
Licensed taxi and private hire drivers operate within a tightly controlled framework. They incur costs and meet obligations that are fundamental to the system. These range from vehicle compliance and insurance requirements to ongoing regulatory oversight.
Allowing an unlicensed service to operate in a similar manner, even for benign reasons, risks undermining that framework. It introduces a form of competition that is not subject to the same rules.
This is not simply about protecting income, though that is naturally a concern for those in the trade; it is about maintaining a level playing field and ensuring that the regulatory system remains coherent.
63
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74
