ONE TAP TOO FAR
The safest professional position is therefore straight- forward. If a booking requires reading, thought, selection, rejection, messaging or manual response, the driver should stop safely before dealing with it. A properly mounted device may reduce one category of risk. It does not remove the duty to drive with due care and attention.
Licensing consequences
For an ordinary motorist, six penalty points and a £200 fine are serious. For a taxi or private hire driver, they may be occupationally significant.
A licensed driver depends not only on a DVLA driving entitlement, but also on the continuing confidence of the licensing authority. Road safety, compliance with legal obligations, honesty in reporting matters, and professional judgment are all relevant to the fit and proper assessment. A mobile phone offence may therefore become part of a wider regulatory evaluation.
The Department for Transport’s Statutory Taxi and Private Hire Vehicle Standards are particularly important. They state that, where an applicant has a conviction for using a handheld mobile telephone or handheld device while driving, a licence should not be granted until at least five years have elapsed since the conviction or completion of any sentence or driving ban, whichever is later. That guidance is directed to applicants, but licensing authorities may also treat such offending as highly relevant when considering existing licence
holders, renewals, reviews and enforcement action.
Outside London, private hire driver licensing is generally governed by
the Local Government
(Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976. A private hire driver’s licence should not be granted unless the authority is satisfied that the applicant is a fit and proper person. Section 61 also gives authorities the power to suspend or revoke a driver’s licence on specified grounds, including “any other reasonable cause”. Hackney carriage driver licensing follows its own statutory route, but the practical regulatory exercise is similar: the authority must assess whether the driver remains suitable to be licensed in light of public safety and the facts before it.
A single fixed penalty will not always lead to suspension or revocation. Licensing decisions are fact- sensitive and must be proportionate. The authority will
28
usually consider the nature of the conduct, whether passengers were being carried, whether there was poor driving, whether there was a collision or near miss, whether the driver has a previous motoring or licensing history, and whether the matter was promptly disclosed. Repeated offences, concealment, minimisation, or evidence of routine app interaction while moving may all aggravate the position.
Non-disclosure often causes particular difficulty. Many licensing policies and licence conditions require drivers to notify the authority of convictions, fixed penalties, cautions, penalty points, arrests, charges or other relevant matters within a specified period. Where a driver fails to notify, the authority may treat the failure as a separate concern about honesty, openness and compliance. In some cases, that failure may become more damaging than the original offence.
For newly qualified drivers, the practical consequence may be immediate. Six points within the first two years after passing the driving test can result in the revocation of the driving licence under the new driver regime. Without a DVLA entitlement, a taxi or private hire driver cannot lawfully continue driving licensed vehicles.
Operator systems & regulatory exposure
This issue should not be viewed solely as a matter of individual driver behaviour. Operators also have regulatory exposure where their systems, expectations or working culture encourage unsafe device interaction.
An operator may not physically compel a driver to touch a phone while driving, but dispatch design and commercial pressure can materially influence behaviour. Systems that require drivers to respond quickly to detailed on-screen offers, review multiple data points while moving, or engage with passenger messages during a journey create foreseeable risk. Where an operator finds themselves subject to review following an incident, the licensing authority may examine not only the driver’s conduct, but also the operator’s policies, training, app configuration, supervision and response to known risks.
A written mobile device policy is useful only if it reflects operational reality. It should prohibit handheld use while driving, require devices to be securely mounted, make clear that devices must not obstruct the driver’s view, and confirm that drivers must not read, type or respond
AUGUST 2026 PHTM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74
