search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
DESIGNING LIBRARIES


How public libraries support children with SEND


Public libraries have a long tradition of welcoming all-comers but traditional libraries present extra challenges for some, including children with SEND – special educational needs and disabilities. Designing Libraries Director Ayub Khan looks at how libraries are offering support.


AN estimated 1.6 million pupils in England have special educational needs. The Westminster Government is clear about the impact SEND can have on a child’s learning, affecting their behaviour or ability to social- ise, reading and writing, ability to understand things, concentration levels and/or physical ability. An estimated 1.6 million pupils in England have special educational needs. The Government is clear about the impact­


Emily­ and­ Ben­ previously­ collaborated­ on­ the­ Listening­ Desk,­an­interactive­installation­for­the­British­Library­in­2023,­ which gave access to rare sound archives across ten major UK institutions. Their shared vision of accessibility and design innovation­continues­at­Haydock­Library,­where­Peasgood­is­ again taking a distinctive, community-led approach.


Co-design ­SEND­can­have­on­a­child’s­learning,­affecting­their­


behaviour or ability to socialise; reading and writing; ability to understand things; concentration levels; and/or physical ability. First­ let’s­ define­terms:­A­ disability­ is­a­physical­or­mental­ condition that limits movements, senses, or activities. Special needs are educational requirements arising from physical or intellectual­ disability­ or­ behavioural­ difficulties­–­ an­ illness­ or­condition­that­makes­it­difficult­to­do­the­things­others­do.­ Neurodiversity is displayed or characterised by autistic or other neurologically atypical patterns of thought or behaviour. It must be said that not everyone approves of such labels. Some disability rights activists dislike the term SEND, saying it has derogatory connotations. ‘Additional needs’ is an alter- native description. Others think we are sometimes too ready to­interpret­differences­as­deficits­when­talking­about­autism.­ So it’s a topic not without controversy. Children­who­need­additional­support­may­have:


l­­Physically­disabilities­–­impaired­movement,­speech, hearing or sight;


l­­conditions­such­as­cerebral­palsy­or­cystic­fibrosis; l­­difficulties­with­co-ordinated­movement­–­dyspraxia; l cognitive disabilities like autism or Down Syndrome;


l­­difficulties­with­words­or­numbers­–­dyslexia,­dyscalculia, dysgraphia;


l­­attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity­Disorder­(ADHD).


Case study: Emily Peasgood Studio at Haydock Library, St Helens, Merseyside St­Helens­Council­has­commissioned­Emily­Peasgood­Studio­ to­reimagine­Haydock­Library­as­a­sensory-inclusive­space­ for­children­and­adults­with­special­needs.­Led­by­artist­Dr­ Emily Peasgood in collaboration with architects practice Studio Ben Allen, the project represents a bold departure from conventional library design. Emily is an award-winning composer and artist known for creating innovative public artworks in libraries and community settings, specialising in inclusive engagement and co-creation.


10 INFORMATION PROFESSIONAL Autumn 2025


Rather than designing for the community, Peasgood is design- ing with them. Over the past three months, she has led a par- ticipation programme of Go-See visits to other libraries, and library design workshops, shaped by a steering group of St Helens­Council­staff­and­local­charities,­including­BuzzHub­ St­ Helens­ CDP­ and­ Listen4Change­ Parent­ Carer­ Forum,­ where­ 76­ people­ participated,­ including­ 18­ library­ staff,­ 12­ support­workers,­10­carers,­and­36­adults­and­children­with­ disabilities.


Throughout the engagement process, facilitators supported


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70