search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
educational opportunities, and a scenario in which older adults work in tech as part of their community life are all ideas that could give a sense of collaboration, purpose, and being part of something. There has also been an uptick in atten- tion to the Green House®


model—or the


“small house” model, in which a commu- nity is not a trademarked Green House but uses many of the organization’s principles and findings. The Green House®


Project (GHP) not-


for-profit has been active with its model for about 17 years. Green House homes are “small-scale, self-contained, and self-suf- ficient nursing home and assisted living settings that put elders at the center. Each home includes private rooms and


bathrooms for each elder, a living room with a fireplace, and outdoor spaces that are easy to access and navigate.” About 300 homes have been built in 32 states. The group also provides guidance


for culture change and has a memory care approach. The interest comes because Green


House and small house residences reported lower COVID-19 rates—a case rate 3.8 times lower than in traditional skilled nurs- ing, according to the Green House Project. Solo isolation is also less of a problem: Few- er residents overall makes for a “pod” affect, where risks are reduced for small groups. It’s much like the “friend pods” of


screened friends or relatives in groups of six that many people of all ages have adopt- ed during the pandemic, or the "bubbles" created for child care or sports, but on a smaller scale. The Great Recession served to slow


adoption of this model, but some of its qual- ities, culture, and design features could lead to further innovation to tackle the isolation/ safety paradox. Some traditionally designed communities are planning design changes, shifting wings, and combining living areas


to avoid having single residents isolated for full days in single rooms whenever possible while maintaining safety is the goal.


New solutions ahead While the concern over present and future pandemics and other health issues such as chronic conditions could clip the wings of some visions for the future, the report con- tributors don’t see this as an insurmountable obstacle. “The fundamentals in the senior living


business are still there. The things that de- fine a generation and their life experience are still there,” Moldow says. “People living longer and having a ‘third


act’—these things are going to start generat- ing new solutions. These will partially come from senior living providers, but they could come from left field—Google, for instance, or other outside actors. If people aren't stay- ing up to date, creating those new models, they're going to fall behind.”


BETTERSENIOR LIVING.Togeter.


September 13-15, 2021 | Phoenix, AZ Phoenix Convention Center CONFERENCE.ARGENTUM.ORG


Sav te Date! JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2021 ARGENTUM.ORG 25


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44