search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Resources


Budget for energy


Getting the right energy deal for your school is crucial. As schools grapple with inflated bills, energy consultant Tim Warneford looks at what’s gone wrong and how to fix it


A


s if school budgets weren’t tight enough already, April’s energy price hikes added even more pressure.


Many schools within local authority procurement frameworks were shocked at their new energy rates. Academies weren’t immune either, particularly if they had used unregulated brokers working on commission from suppliers. An NAHT survey of school leaders


found that 15 per cent were reducing the number of teachers, or teaching hours, to deal with rising prices. More than half were reducing investment in equipment, maintenance and capital spending. The DfE is belatedly looking


at how it might support schools, having previously stated that the


impact of rising energy prices would be ‘minimal’. Try telling that to schools which have seen energy costs more than double, with the average bill now close to 3.5% of the total budget. Running a webinar with School


Business Services in February, I heard from many schools facing difficulties because they had not procured new energy contracts last year when prices were lower. The director of finance at the Inspiring Primaries Academies Trust in Leicestershire, Chris Hall, talked about the ‘Hobsons’s choice’ facing schools. He had been quoted a 24-month contract at a rate increase of 126%, or a 12-month contract at a staggering 170%. The problem is that since schools


operate within commercial spaces, they have to buy from an energy market that is unregulated. This puts them at risk from brokers who ‘cold call’, particularly if no due diligence is undertaken before a provider is appointed. Neither can local authority frameworks guarantee Best Value, since they lack a transparent competitive tender process. At best, such frameworks can act as a tracker, but rates are not disclosed in advance and there is very little protection for schools from large spikes in cost.


Future options According to the chief executive of Centrica, Chris O’Shea, high energy


FundEd SUMMER 2022 39


IMAGES: IR_STONE/ISTOCKPHOTO.COM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44