Image: Mark D Bailey / Shutterstock.com 4


Whitehall and Number 10 North, those leaders that the PM believes are a ‘better bet’.


Phil Riley, leader of Blackburn with Darwen Council, one of the three current unitary local authorities on the non mayoral Lancashire Combined County Authority, is among those urging action to prevent this happening.


His message to his fellow political leaders, shared in our Hotspots feature, is both loud and clear: “It is time for us to show our pride in Lancashire, end the debate and to take the power. Surely it is far better to have the power and then debate, than letting this opportunity pass because we couldn’t agree.”


There’s another D-word that is increasingly part of the conversation as we look to see what direction Andy Burnham will take us: defence.


In association with:


The new incumbent in Number 10 looks to be aiming to centre his defence investment plans on reindustrialising the UK.


Devolution. It’s a subject we have never shied away from and one that we return to once again in the pages of this edition.


ENTER NOW DEADLINE:


Midnight, Friday 4 December 2026 Judging partner:


Energy partner: Runway sponsor: Sponsored by:


In our look at the impact new prime minister Andy Burnham is set to have on the nation’s economic development it is clear that the former mayor of Greater Manchester believes devolution will be a major tool in his work to boost productivity.


He’s looking to put more decision making – and money – in the hands of directly elected mayors up and down the country. That can only be good news for the north west of England.


The trouble for Lancashire is that we don’t have a mayor. And while other parts of England push to ride the devolution train for all its worth, as a frustrated Mo Isap declares in our interview with him on page 8, our county stands on the platform, ticket in hand, seemingly reluctant to make the trip.


Mo, the chair of the Lancashire Business Board, part of the non mayoral Combined County Authority, has done the maths and


Richard Slater publisher richard@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295584


Supported by:


Dan Clough editor dan@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 297870


ENTER HERE


redroseawards.co.uk @redroseawards


#RRA27


Abbey Coates operations and events director abbey@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295585


Anna King


senior administrator anna@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295582


Adam Varnom graphic designer adam@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295585


believes the county is losing an estimated £1.4m a day in devolution funding as a result. He describes that as ‘catastrophic’.


It really is, and so is the doom loop that Lancashire seems to have been caught in for at least a decade, a seemingly never-ending debate among our political leaders when it comes to an elected mayor that might have got us reluctantly to the platform but in growing danger of missing that train.


Why is that a danger? Simply because the direction of travel strongly suggests it will be the mayoral authorities that will be at the front of the queue when it comes to money for transport improvement, skills, innovation, unlocking growth and supporting businesses. The mayors will be those who will have the access to


Lancashire should be perfectly placed to take advantage of this and to push for inward investment, with a focus on building on the massive skills and know-how we have amassed over decades.


The fear is, with rival parts of the country having mayors given the power and funding to pump money into inward investment initiatives, we may miss out on the major prizes as businesses are tempted elsewhere.


Mo Isap points to the benefits areas such as South Yorkshire are currently reaping – including a £2m grant the mayoral authority has given Rolls-Royce to unlock a £19m investment by the aero engine giant in advanced manufacturing.


He declares: “Lancashire is built on innovation and industry; the reality is that today we are in a state of inertia, and that’s a dangerous place to be.”


The mayors will be those who will have access


to Whitehall and Number 10 North, those leaders that the PM believes are a better bet


Joanne Hindley sales director joanne@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295585


Ged Henderson editor at large editor@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295585


Farah Cheema marketing lead farah@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295587


Abigail Swarbrick administrator abigail@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295582


Paula Walsh finance assistant paula@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 297870


Lancashire Business View is written, designed and produced in Lancashire by Northpoint Publishing.


Lancashire Business View and LBV are registered trademarks.


The views expressed by our columnists are not necessarily shared by Lancashire Business View.


Photography: Clive Lawrence, Paul Adams, Liz Henson Photography and Abigail Swarbrick.


Printers: Peter Scott Printers, Burnley


Northpoint Publishing East Park Lodge, East Park Road, Blackburn BB1 8DW


t: 01254 297870 ISSN: 1757-479X


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76