search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MAIN FEATURE


ROADS


Whilst readers may thin that implementing monitoring and maintaining rail drainage might be complex enough with a national and regional approach with five regions and 15 major lines, they should perhaps consider this as not so much simple but organised with the national and regional operations looking to each other for support and sharing of information and technical know-how. The question is how much of this, what might be seen as ‘joined-up-thinking’ is reflected in the nation’s road network?


The biggest name known to most of the general public is Highways England (or whichever regional office covers that part of the United Kingdom for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland).


If we look at England as the larger example, whilst probably the best known name, Highways England looks after only around 2% of the roads which mostly include the motorways and major A roads.


Beyond this, the problem sometimes arises that responsibility for any particular highway drain (a highway drainage system is defined as where water that drains from roads and footpaths flows into public drainage systems) may be difficult to establish. Local authorities


8


have the main responsibility for maintenance and repair of the majority of the drains servicing the road networks that are not Highways England routes. But within this there is the question of which roads are actually the ‘local’ authority’s responsibility. With private roads not being a responsibility there may be questions as to whether some roads are County, District, Metropolitan, Town or other authority responsibility. Disagreement may occur as to whose is responsible for what road may not just on the basis of the road itself. Given the state of local government finances it may be the case that it is ‘politic’ to argue that one road or another is someone else’s responsibility simply as a way to try minimise spend from an authority’s road budget. But that perhaps is getting too political.


As with rail most authorities are permitted to tender their road contracts to recognised and vetted contractors, subcontractors and specialists depending on the work that has to be done, with many utilising term contractors as their main point of contact over a fixed period of years. To visit all of the different contractors that are involved with this huge amount of work would be impossible here. So instead we look at some the views of those that offer equipment and products to these operations and see what they say about how


| March 2021 | www.draintraderltd.com


best the roadside drainage industry can be supported.


STUDIES


One example of the type of study that involves the roadside drainage operation is one launched by Highways England to study whether surface water which runs off roads affects the level of micro-plastics in the environment. As the Government company responsible for motorways and major A roads it is committed to minimising the environmental impact of its network and in particular the vehicles using it. It already has clear assessment and design standards for maintaining and improving drainage systems on its network. Now it has kick-started this research to see if more can be done, and has recently published initial research identifying what evidence exists and to determine what further research needs doing. The academic desk top findings have also secured funding to investigate the issue further through ‘on road’ investigations.


Michael Whitehead, Principal Advisor for Water at Highways England, said: “Highways England takes environmental issues seriously and recognises the global concern around micro- plastic pollution. We have undertaken this research together with the Environment


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80