search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE MAGAZINE FOR THE DRAINAGE, WATER & WASTEWATER INDUSTRIES


EDITOR’S PICKS


ground.


■ Surface water should be recognised as a potential source of water and reused where practical.


■ Relatively clean surface water should be kept separate from contaminated surface water and foul sewage. Wide-scale


separation of existing combined systems is unlikely to be affordable but retrofitting measures to reduce surface water inputs to combined systems will be important. Wrong connections in existing separate systems should be eliminated as far as is practical, recognising that many of them are on the private elements of the system.


■ Charging for surface water management should be used to incentivise separation and source control.


Pathway - retain and redirect Sewage pumping station next to water company offices Receptor - resist and re-site


Actions to minimise the impact of drainage systems and pathways on society and the environment.


■ Impact on properties, infrastructure and the environment should be considered on a risk based framework that includes the true costs of impact to all stakeholders.


■ Environmental impacts on watercourses include erosion as well as acute and chronic pollution. Impacts on groundwater


should also be considered. During extreme events, pollution control measures may be overwhelmed and bypass facilities should be provided. Eroding discharges into watercourses should be controlled even in extreme events, to avoid irrevocable damage.


■ Properties and vulnerable infrastructure should be in locations that do not flood or the impact of any flooding should be


■ Surface water should normally be conveyed on the surface unless this is unsafe or impractical. This increases the


amenity potential and reduces the risk of wrong connections and pollution. It can also reduce the need for pumping.


■ Surface water conveyance and storage should utilise vegetation to reduce velocities, increase infiltration and


trap pollutants.


■ Surface water infrastructure should be designed for exceedance so that excess flows are safely conveyed or


stored. Surface conveyance of flows makes the transition to exceedance easier to manage.


■ Urban areas should be planned with space to accommodate flood pathways and flood storage areas and


these should be designed and designated as such. These spaces can also fulfil other functions such as roads, paths or open space.


■ Existing piped systems will be important in managing surface water for the foreseeable future. Upgrading or


improved operation of elements that restrict drainage capacity may therefore be appropriate.


FOLLOW US


managed by mitigation measures: Local flood defence works such as demountable barriers or flood gates. Improved building resistance such as anti-flood devices. Improved building resilience by using water resistant construction materials.


■ Where it is uneconomic to manage the risk of damage to property or infrastructure they may need to be relocated or


abandoned. What does it all mean


We need to consider the whole source-pathway-receptor system of urban drainage. The management of exceedance flows has so far not been sufficiently considered.


We need to plan exceedance surface flow routes for existing and new developments. For new developments; avoid putting properties or sensitive infrastructure on or near these routes. For existing developments consider moving sensitive infrastructure and consider creating flow pathways. Purchasing and de- developing redundant or derelict properties may be part of this.


The problem is that surface flow pathways are the responsibility of the local authorities and they have neither the resources nor necessarily the powers to take the necessary action.


The first draft of the 2010 Flood and Water Management Act included a clause that would allow the Environment Agency to dig a watercourse along any highway. Unfortunately this didn't make it into law. Shame, as I would love to see it becoming commonplace.


June 2024 | 51


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84