THE MAGAZINE FOR THE DRAINAGE, WATER & WASTEWATER INDUSTRIES
FLOODS & SUDS
Committee were interested to note that the applicant’s water level observations did not coincide with any of the heavy rainfall events that took place.”
Standlake is located alongside the River Windrush, close to the point where it joins the River Thames. Village residents have become accustomed to regular flooding, which is mostly derived from rising groundwater. Drainage pipe ingress is also a problem and Thames Water frequently supplies tankers to help alleviate flood damage. However, Standlake is by no means unique with its flood-related challenges and since their success in fighting the development application, the campaigners have been contacted by other villages seeking help and advice on ways to handle planning applications in flood zones.
“Our recommendation is always to gather reliable data,” says Paula Gaffney. “The installation of the monitoring system was much easier than we initially anticipated. Digging the boreholes was probably the hardest part! The telephone support from OTT HydroMet was excellent – helping us to set the monitor to record the distance from ground surface to the water, which was occasionally near to zero, after heavy rain.
“Online access to the data via the Hydromet Cloud web portal provided by OTT Hydromet was also very useful.
FOLLOW US
The ability to access real-time data in the cloud gave full and transparent data access to the WODC planning and drainage officers so that they could see the rapid rise of high water table events and the slow infiltration rate as ground water levels fell over several days.”
The OTT ecoLog 1000 comprises a data logger connected by cable to a stainless-steel probe containing a very stable ceramic pressure cell. The datalogger stores measurements locally, but also transmits encrypted data to a website that can be easily accessed by all stakeholders, providing transparent access to trustworthy data.
Explaining the importance of data reliability, Paula says: “The installation of the ecoLog was simple and intuitive, but we were keen for OTT’s support engineers to check the configuration, so that it could be relied upon as evidence. This contrasted starkly with the applicant’s manually derived measurements, which were obviously selective and, in some cases, could be erroneous.”
Oxfordshire County Council’s drainage engineer visited the site and determined that the logger’s data demonstrated the site to be outside the tolerance required for effective soakaways. He also noted the absence of readings by the applicant during or following flood events and suggested that the applicant should also operate
an automatic borehole logger.
Summarising, Paula says: “We were very impressed with the diligence of the WODC Lowlands Planning Sub Committee, and obviously delighted that the evidence we provided empowered them to determine that the proposed development would result in unacceptable flood risk. In fact, one of the councillors remarked that this was the first time an application had been refused on the grounds of flood risk.”
Typical users of the OTT ecoLog 1000 include government agencies, flood managers, developers, local communities, highway managers, rail network operators, water companies and water resource managers, as well as consultants, academics and environmental researchers. However, OTT HydroMet’s Dr Liam Goodes says: “Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of extreme weather, so it seems likely that flood risk is set to become a greater issue in planning and development.
“Obviously, Planning decisions have to be informed by reliable facts, underpinned by accurate data. Groundwater levels can change quickly, so the OTT ecoLog offers all stakeholders, including councils, developers and local communities, an opportunity to create reliable evidence to ensure that planning decisions are fair and underpinned by science.”
June 2024 | 45
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84
