Legal Ease


Pregnant Employees and Employer Obligations By Richard D. Alaniz, Alaniz Law & Associates


While sexual harassment and gender equity issues often garner more attention, how to deal with a pregnant employee who


W may have work


continues to vex employers. It’s an issue that’s often a source of consternation, and if improperly handled could result in legal liability to employers. In 1978 Congress passed the


Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), which established that pregnancy-related matters are encompassed within the prohibition against sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In essence, it requires employers to provide the same accommodations to pregnant women as any other employee with similar ability or inability to work. In addition to federal law, almost 50% of the states and numerous cities have adopted regulations requiring employers to provide work accommodations for pregnant employees. Accommodations for


pregnant employees have been


an enforcement priority for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). It was identified as a “National Substantive Area Priority” under the 2017-2021 EEOC Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP). The Americans with Disabilities Act


(ADA) also imposes certain employer obligations regarding pregnancy. Generally, the ADA requires employers to provide reasonable accommodation to employees with a “disability” that affects their ability to perform their job. While pregnancy is not a disability, numerous pregnancy-related conditions qualify


48 ❘ May 2022 ®


omen comprise over half the American workforce, and that number increases annually.


limitations


as disabilities potentially


a requiring employers provide “disability.” following Thus, to accommodation.


The ADA Amendments Act (ADAAA) passed in 2009 expanded the definition of


pregnancy-


related impairments might more easily qualify as “disabilities” today than before the amendments. For example, the


pregnancy-related


conditions could constitute a disability under the ADAA: anemia, depression, gestational diabetes, morning sickness, preeclampsia, and swelling of the feet and legs. The Supreme Court addressed em-


ployers’ responsibility to accommodate pregnant employees in 2015. In the case of Young v. UPS, the Court ruled in favor of a pregnant UPS driver who challenged UPS’s denial of light duty work assignments during pregnancy to accommodate her lifting restrictions. UPS had successfully argued before the lower courts that light duty was properly reserved for employees injured on the job and that pregnancy was not similar. The Court concluded that an employer is required to offer a reasonable accom- modation to a pregnant employee to the same extent that it offered an accommo- dation to any other employee that was similarly limited. In 2019 the House of


Representatives proposed a bill entitled The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act with the stated purpose of clarifying the ruling in the Young v. UPS case. It was contended that despite the provisions of the PDA and the Young decision, similar situations of pregnant employees denied accommodation continued to arise in many workplaces.


According to Gillian Thomas, a senior attorney with the ACLU’s Woman’s Rights Project, “Roughly a quarter of a million women a year do not get the accommodations they need to keep working.” She noted despite the clear legal requirements, pregnant women are still being forced off the job. Had the proposed law passed, it would have mandated employers utilize the “interactive process” to determine what reasonable accommodation(s) can be offered to pregnant workers, which is the same framework required under the ADA.


Notwithstanding pregnant claims requirements under the action against of


continued employer failures to accommodate the


employees, relevant


legal authorities is clear. For current pregnancy, an employer cannot fire, refuse to hire, demote, or take other adverse


a woman


motivated by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical condition. This is true even if the employer believes it is acting in the employee’s best interest. Similarly, an


employer may not discriminate


based upon an employee’s intention or potential to become pregnant. Nor may an employer force an employee to take leave because she is pregnant. If the employee is limited in the performance of her job duties and is entitled to accommodation under the PDA or ADA, an employer may need to provide reasonable accommodation. Not all pregnant employees


develop limitations affecting their ability to perform their job. However, when limitations do arise, employers should carefully consider the following


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52