search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEWS YOU NEED TO KNOW 4


Capable boss issues warning over bogus CEO


Juliet Dennis juliet.dennis@travelweekly.co.uk


Travel anti-fraud group Profit has issued a warning to the trade after a conman was found to be posing as the chief executive of a UK travel agency.


Advantage Travel Partnership member Capable Travel received messages online from individuals in the Middle East and Afghanistan who believed they had met the company’s chief executive. They had been offered jobs and work visas in the UK and Canada for $200.


Capable Travel director Jorge Herrera


Jorge Herrera, managing director


of London-based Capable Travel, said: “I am worried about our reputation, but more importantly about the people this man is conning. He is extorting money from innocent people, obviously taking advantage of anyone who wants to come and live in the UK.” Herrera contacted the police


about two months ago when he was first alerted to a man going by the name of Mohammed Rizwan posing as the firm’s chief executive. Herrera has since continued to receive emails about the imposter. A spokeswoman for Action


Fraud said the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau at the City of London Police had looked at the case but found no leads that would result in a successful criminal investigation. Barry Gooch, chairman of the


Prevention of Fraud in Travel group, advised companies to set up Google Alerts to monitor how many times a company name is being used online, and to use the Public Register Search System, an online tool that searches the WHOIS database of website


owners. It allows you to create automated searches to monitor spoof websites. He also recommended businesses apply a digital signature to websites so they can catch criminals who clone sites and use them under other domains. Gooch said: “This type of


fraud is increasingly common across the travel industry and typically companies only become aware when they start receiving complaints from people they have never dealt with previously.”


5 STORIES HOT


5 Ministers to place LTAs outside Atol


Lee Hayhurst lee.hayhurst@travelweekly.co.uk


The government will ignore industry demands for the CAA to regulate Linked Travel Arrangements (LTAs) as part of the Atol regime under new Package Travel Regulations to come into force in July.


LTAs will instead by regulated by


local authority Trading Standards’ officers, with the government deciding this new category of bookings created by the European


Package Travel Directive (PTD) to capture “click-through” sales between websites might otherwise compromise the Atol scheme. The Department for Business


(BEIS) has yet to publish the regulations to enshrine the directive in UK law. These will widen the definition of a package to include bookings now deemed Flight-Plus in the UK. Bookings defined as LTAs


will require financial protection against the risk of a company going bust, but they will not carry the liabilities of a package.


6 travelweekly.co.uk 22 February 2018


“The draft Atol regulations and Atol Standard Terms should clarify the situation”


The Department for Transport


(DfT) and BEIS declined to comment. However, Travel Weekly understands confirmation is imminent. The DfT oversees the Atol regulations. Abta and the CAA have questioned whether many current UK bookings would fall within the


definition of an LTA. But there are concerns the LTA category could offer a means to avoid compliance with the new regulations. The DfT noted a “clear


preference [in the industry] for the inclusion of flight-related LTAs within the Atol scheme” when it consulted on potential changes to the Atol scheme in late 2016. Abta director of legal affairs


Simon Bunce said: “The government and CAA are still to publish the draft Atol regulations and Atol Standard Terms, which should clarify the situation.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80