search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Lube-Tech


Chemometric AN by FTIR – Neat Oils Almost all current FTIR AN (and BN) methods are based on the direct analysis of neat-oils using chemometric, Partial Least Squares (PLS) based methods. These require calibrations being available or developed as software add-ons to laboratory CM systems (6) and stand-alone FTIR systems, but are most common for on-site FTIR (7), grating IR (8) and filter Infrared (IR) analysers (9). The latter have built in chemometric calibrations, targeting users with machinery infrastructure requiring local monitoring rather than sending samples to a commercial CM lab for analysis. Such instruments come with generalised Library chemometric calibrations developed by the instrument supplier relating AN/BN titrimetric data to correlating spectral features of in-use oils representative of a particular oil-type, class, or family (8). Many of these systems are cited or listed as following designated ASTM approved protocols (e.g., D7418, D7417, D7889) which provide a veneer of official approval. These protocols, however, relate specifically to operational qualitative attributes rather than quantitative capabilities (e.g., predicting AN or BN) often associated with ASTM approved procedures. As a result, users tend to place undue reliance on the predictive ability of such instrumentation assuming the outputs to be representative of ASTM titrimetric procedures.


Advanced chemometrics can only model so much on a correlation-only basis without having a substantive cause-and-effect spectral signal to work with, lacking in most circumstances aside from being restricted to the oils modeled in the calibration. The veracity of the predictions is heavily reliant on proper selection of the representative oil-type, additive package, and lubricant application to have a reasonable expectation of obtaining rough and ready estimates of AN or BN. Thus, anyone using direct PLS-only approaches and instrumentation must be quite cautious in reporting, relying, and acting on chemometric-based analytical results if they are to be used for critical determinative in-use lubricant assessments.


PUBLISHED BY LUBE: THE EUROPEAN LUBRICANTS INDUSTRY MAGAZINE


No.134 page 2


Stoichiometric AN by FTIR – Diluted Oils The stoichiometric AN approach, which relies on dilution of a sample containing a basic reagent to react with acids in oils has been limited to specific automated CM systems. Here a spectrally active base in a carrier solvent is added to an oil to elicit a spectral response proportionate to the acidity present in an oil, mimicking ASTM D664. Designed for high throughputs labs, it is also oil-type restricted, involves a chemometric element (1) and is not suited for on-site analysis.


A new manual stoichiometric FTIR AN method has been developed to generically address on-site capabilities as well as overcome the universality limitations associated with oil-specific direct chemometric methods and their associated accuracy and validation issues (2). The manual stoichiometric AN method has some unique benefits, including being independent of oil-type as well as being capable of acid differentiation. It is limited to ~20 samples/h because it uses a split-paired vs. the single-sample approach of the automated version, with both relying on a base to react with acids much like ASTM D664, but determines the reaction “endpoint” spectroscopically.


Concept


In the AN stoichiometric methods, a primary calibration is devised by adding oleic acid to a neutral hydrocarbon matrix and treated with NaPhenolate delivered via a solvent carrier. In the new manual method, the oil sample is split into two equal portions, with a reagent- free Solvent-Diluent added to one portion and a Reagent-Diluent containing NaPhenolate, the IR active base, added to the other and spectrally analysed as a pair; hence the term split-paired analysis. These are scanned sequentially, first as a background scan (Ion followed by a sample scan (In); producing a differential spectrum -Log (In/Ion


) ) = ΔAbsn . This contrasts to the


automated method, where a representative sample of the oil-type undergoing analysis (e.g., mineral based turbine oils) is used as a common reference spectrum


LUBE MAGAZINE NO.163 JUNE 2021 25


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53