Opinion
opinion // Sameer Sawant We need precision, not panic
With headline horror stories about high-silica surfaces now turning up in the national press, Sameer Sawant, director atVelstone explains why professionals need to be ready to tackle any misconceptions with consumers
T
he recent 18 cases of silicosis linked to the processing of articial stone worktops, and
subsequent calls for a ban – like Australia’s last year – growing louder, are hugely concerning. As a manufacturer with over two
decades in the solid surface industry, I believe it’s crucial we address this issue
with precision rather than
panic; it demands clarity, expertise, and a recommitment to safety across our sector. For years, industry bodies have primarily focused on fabrication as the point of most risk for silica exposure, and evidence still supports this. It’s during the initial cutting and polishing of engineered stone containing high levels of crystalline silica that the greatest amount of hazardous dust is generated. A common misconception is that
quartz emits silica in its installed state, whereas, in reality, exposure occurs during cutting and polishing. Wet cutting in workshops minimises airborne dust, but on-site alterations during installation, such as trimming upstands and routing sink cutouts, often require dry cutting. Without proper extraction and PPE, this can lead to dust containing silica becoming airborne. The new HSE guidance, primarily
The recent headlines should not serve as a source of industry-wide panic but as a chance for positive change
"
directed at installers, outlines safety measures to mitigate this risk. While responsible fabricators
enforce safety measures onsite, some companies fail to invest in these tools, and sometimes workers neglect to wear protective gear. On commercial sites, strict health and safety protocols are typically enforced, but domestic installations rely on self-governance which has led to a growing stigma among homeowners and kitchen studios.
Mixed messages Perhaps the most important
message for specifiers, designers, and retailers to understand is that worktop materials vary dramatically
in their composition, fabrication requirements, and health risks. Engineered stone, such as quartz,
contains much higher levels of crystalline silica than natural stone and is a greater risk to workers processing it without proper protection. Unlike natural stone, Velstone is non-porous, 100% silica-free, and completely safe to machine and use, producing only non-hazardous ‘nuisance dust’ during fabrication. Some manufacturers have begun offering safer, “silica-free” engineered quartz products, which is a positive development. However, these alternatives can be charged at a premium, and they lack the mechanical strength of the
conventional quartz products. To ensure informed decision- making, designers and specifiers must deepen their understanding of materials, retailers should accurately communicate safety requirements, and fabricators and installers must have proper training and equipment. While the importance of PPE has always been highlighted in guidelines, silica exposure concerns date back at least 20 years, though back then, the long-term risks were largely theoretical. Without government intervention, such as licensing requirements or penalties for non-compliance, those concerns are unlikely to disappear. What the current spotlight on
artificial stone and silicosis does offer our industry is an opportunity to re- evaluate and improve practices. The recent headlines should not serve as a source of industry-wide panic but as a chance for positive change. As Australia’s ban demonstrates,
regulatory intervention may become necessary if the industry doesn’t address these concerns voluntarily. Rather than waiting for such measures, forward-thinking companies should be proactive to set new standards for what professionals and consumers alike should expect from modern solid surfacing materials.
kbbr
What do you think? We always want to hear your views and opinions, so email
editor@kbbreview.com to be featured in a future issue
May 2025
kbbreview
15
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64
