search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PATI ENT SAFE T Y


Patient safety: the devil is in the data


With the recent announcement from Matt Hancock about reducing bureaucracy and the publication of the consultation document, ‘Busting bureaucracy: empowering frontline staff by reducing excess bureaucracy in the health and care system in England’,1


the time is ripe to look at how


managing data more efficiently and applying the experiences of high reliability organisations can have a dramatic impact on patient safety.


The CQC is taking an in-depth look at how health and care services work together and how they can evolve in order to meet people’s needs and improve outcomes for all concerned. In doing so, patient safety is being pushed firmly to the top of the agenda. As eloquently argued in ‘Still Not Safe’ by


Robert L. Wears and Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, the modern patient safety movement (now in its third decade) has yet to realise its potential. They argue that, for the potential to be realised, healthcare has to embrace the expert process and knowledge of safety science. To quote: “change will require health professionals to … develop truly


substantive and equal co-partnership with safety scientists”.


The identification of opportunities to learn and improve safety is a critical facet of safety processes and is core to successfully implementing three of the five characteristics of high reliability.2


of a potentially high reliability industry, with its hyper-complexity, tight interdependence between different departments for patient outcomes, multiple levels and hierarchies for decision making, and the requirement for fast, emergency action often in compressed timescales with critical outcomes that can be a matter of life and death.


Healthcare is a classic example


Safety has always been a key concern and there have been numerous investigations and reports after certain scandals. All of these highlight that the focus on opportunities to improve patient safety is often overlooked, a fact acknowledged and something the CQC is looking to address in its latest strategic consultation paper.3 This lack of investment is not, we believe, due to a lack of commitment, but due to the challenge of being able to show that investment in one area will not have a greater detrimental impact on other areas of care. Data is where the answer to this problem will be found.


Incident reporting is a key tool in listening to the experts, i.e. the clinicians and people on the frontline who may not have the most seniority, but have the most in depth knowledge of the processes involved in the care being provided


FEBRUARY 2021


Managing data – not as easy as it sounds A long-standing, key global strategy for improving healthcare quality and reducing the high cost of patient harm has been to leverage the power of big data to identify opportunities for improvement, that would be expensive and difficult to track and manage through human analysis alone. A move away from paper-based records is an essential step in this journey, and something for which the NHS as a whole has numerous targets. Digital transformation will bring many benefits which are already being seen in other industries such as financial services, aviation and utilities. In reaching for these benefits, we as an industry should look to learn from the early experiences of these other sectors. We have seen that a naively executed big data strategy can be incredibly damaging to the performance of organisations and – given the complexity of modern healthcare systems – making the same mistakes could cause significant harm. Unlocking the value of data, by


WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM l 55





Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72