search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SURGERY


Advancing surgical retraction approaches


Angela Spang provides an insight into the development of a simple solution to the challenges associated with surgical retraction – reducing the risk of tissue trauma and pain, as well as improving ease of use and theatre efficiency.


Surgical retractors aid surgeons and operating teams by holding back underlying tissues and organs using hooks and stays to give doctors better visibility and access to the exposed area. Handheld retractors need to be held manually in place, often by nurses and other theatre staff, and this often requires two people, with assistants regularly having to swap hands to prevent fatigue and cramps. This makes handheld retractors fairly unstable because individuals need to move their hands over time as they tire, which leads to surgeons having to readjust the retractor numerous times during an operation, not only increasing procedure time, but also diverting the surgeon’s focus. Another type of retractor is self-retaining, using a screw, ratchet or clamp to hold the tissue by itself, freeing the hands of the surgeon and other staff. The first self- retraining vaginal retractor was originally invented in the 1970s, and the design has barely changed over the years. Traditionally, retractors are available in ‘snowman’ or square shapes. The ‘snowman’ consists of one small and one large incomplete circular


ring – resembling the outline of a snowman – joined together by screws on either side to alter the inclination of the rings; the square version has four movable parts, all joined by screws.


In general, snowman retractors are most commonly used in gynaecology and urology, while the square model is favoured for colorectal, orthopaedic and ENT surgery. Although these models are effective at holding tissue, they are not without their problems. For example, it is quite challenging for surgeons to adjust the position of the rings using a screw mechanism – particularly while holding surgical tools – without the screws coming loose, or even falling out. This may not be a problem if there are enough surgical assistants present to help,


What began as a simple observation during a surgical procedure rapidly led to the development of a novel self-retaining plastic retractor that can be operated with one hand.


20 l WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM


but can be very frustrating for surgeons operating with fewer pairs of hands. Another disadvantage is that the hooks supplied with these retractors can cause trauma to the tissue surrounding the surgical site, to the extent that the resulting tears can end up needing stitches and causing significant discomfort to the patient postoperatively. Miss Tamsin Greenwell, honorary associate professor, University College London, and consultant urological and clinical lead for the female, functional and restorative (FFR) Urology unit at University College Hospitals, London, explained: “We perform a significant volume of upper and lower reconstructive urological surgery for the adverse effects of radiotherapy, complex urinary incontinence, and gynaecological, urological and colorectal surgery in FFR urology.


“In addition, we perform the largest number of procedures for male artificial urinary sphincter insertion, female urethroplasty, urinary tract fistula and urethral diverticulum repairs in the country. “We also care for women with recurrent


FEBRUARY 2021


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72