search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NE PHROLOGY


Remote monitoring of chronic kidney disease


Dr. Robert Lewis, a consultant nephrologist, from Wessex Kidney Centre Portsmouth, argues that patients are keen to embrace web-based remote monitoring, to support self-management of chronic kidney disease. Despite the benefits, some clinicians have been hesitant to adopt the technology. He calls for a change in attitude and shares his insights into the implementation of virtual consultations.


In 2019, the NHS plan set the ambition for greater adoption of remote monitoring and virtual consultations in order to achieve a 33% reduction in outpatient attendance over five years.1


The authors of the NHS


plan could not have foreseen the COVID-19 pandemic, which prompted an abrupt, unplanned reduction in clinic attendance driven by the need to reduce the risk to patients of COVID-19 exposure. Routine face-to-face consultations were largely replaced by telephone or video consultations scheduled at a given date and time using traditional clinic templates. This approach caused minimal disruption to existing administrative processes or staff working practices and thus provided a tolerable quick-fix to meet the needs of an emergency. Prior to the pandemic, there had been growing interest in the application of digital technologies to the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD). These systems have


been shown to be useful for the remote transfer of data from patient to clinician2,3


or


as a means of providing patient education.4 Computer-based software designed for remote management of CKD has been described,5


but


its value in clinical practice remains unclear. The adoption of such technology into routine clinical practice has therefore been slow. The changes in practice forced upon us by the pandemic have shown us that traditional clinics are not the only (or even the best) way to monitor patients with chronic disease. We now have an opportunity to establish the optimal relationship between healthcare users and providers in the digital age. We need to ask if digital technologies can be used to enhance patient involvement and if clinicians need to overhaul their traditional working practices to incorporate these technologies in order to reduce the burden of disease on patients and improve the efficiency of healthcare. This article describes our experience with


a novel web-based application designed to monitor people with CKD remotely while introducing a degree of self-management. It was developed by Ardia Health Care in collaboration with the Wessex Kidney Centre, which provides specialist nephrology, dialysis and renal transplant services to a catchment population of about two million in the central south coast region of England. Although this account relates solely to renal disease, the principles underlying the technology and the way it has been applied in practice could readily be adapted to the management of a wide range of chronic conditions.


Why consider remote monitoring? Many people with a kidney transplant or with stable CKD enjoy a full social and family life and can work full-time. Medical oversight should therefore be delivered in a way that is safe and yet makes the slightest possible intrusion into the ability of these


FEBRUARY 2021


WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM l


31





Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72