search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HEALTHCARE & SUS TAINABI LT Y


Sustainability and single use


George I’ons discusses the impact of the single use on the environment and highlights some potential solutions to reduce the carbon footprint of disposable medical devices.


As the largest employer in Europe and one of the largest employers in the world, the National Health Service is a vast organisation which requires considerable volumes of goods and services to function. Consequently, the NHS is responsible for 4% of England’s total carbon footprint,1


with a significantly higher


percentage of plastic waste compared to other industries. The complexity of infection control means that only about 5% of this plastic waste is being recovered.2


In 2020,


for instance, the need to urgently control COVID-19 infection rates led to increased use of personal protective equipment (PPE), which tends to be made of plastic material and is intended for single-use only. By July, health and social care services in England were already set to surpass PPE distribution in the whole of 2019.3


This unavoidable


increase in plastic waste, exacerbated by the use of single-use face masks among the wider population, has raised greater awareness of the need to improve waste management in the medical industry.


The traditional method of medical


device disposal is incineration, which must increasingly become a last resort due to the environmental damage caused by the process. However, it must be noted that, where incineration cannot be avoided, there are strict European regulations limiting clinical waste emissions,4


and the UK will now need to set


its own limits. Additionally, there are innovative solutions available to contain impact to the environment, such as sophisticated filtering systems which can help to prevent toxic fumes from polluting the atmosphere.


Maintaining safety standards With approximately 90% of medical device waste consisting of disposable, single-use


In one UK take-back scheme, disposable and non-infectious PVC medical devices from over 30 participating hospitals, including oxygen masks, oxygen tubing and IV bags, are turned into products for the horticultural industry, such as tree ties.


APRIL 2021 products or components,5 the challenge


is to resolve the tension between infection control and sustainability. Limiting healthcare- associated infections (HCAIs) must remain a priority, with average HCAI rates at 7.1% in European countries6


and antimicrobial


resistance continuing to be a growing concern. As a consequence, there are strict regulatory requirements which demand single use for many invasive medical devices, as well as stringent measures to protect patients and healthcare workers from needlestick injuries associated with disposable sharps. However, the need to maintain strict safety standards may not be the only factor constraining manufacturers; sustainability measures must also be commercially viable. Disposable products may be a critical source of revenue, while reprocessing single-use devices for reuse can be costly or complex.


Complexities of sterilisation Apart from the cost, sterilising products for reuse comes with limitations. Firstly, sterilisation methods may not necessarily reduce environmental impact if cleaning processes consume higher levels of energy than manufacturing and disposing of single- use devices. Secondly, certain sterilants


WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM l 37





Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88