ESTATES MANAGEMENT
The long-term impact of real-time decision-making
In this practice-led piece, written from the perspective of recurring patterns seen across NHS estates programmes, construction consultancy Gleeds’ head of healthcare Andy McNulty and healthcare sector lead (South West) Simon Yeo argue that, rather than simply through strategy documents and national programmes, the future of the NHS estate is actually being shaped by the thousands of decisions made every day by estates leaders responding to the operational realities of healthcare.
During another busy Tuesday, an estates leader becomes aware of three decisions, each of which feels important. The first relates to a backlog issue that has been
sitting uneasily on the risk register for months. An ageing electrical system serving a clinical area has been flagged again by the estates team. It is not an immediate failure, but everyone involved knows it will need addressing soon, and the longer it remains unresolved the more uncomfortable it becomes. The second emerges later in the afternoon with a
different urgency. A short-notice capital opportunity has appeared late in the financial year. A modest allocation may be available, but only if the organisation can move quickly. The email lands later in the afternoon with a request for an outline proposal by the following morning. There is already a sense of where the funding might be directed, but turning that into a viable project will require quick conversations between estates, finance and clinical colleagues to see whether something deliverable can realistically be mobilised in time. The third relates to an operational pressure elsewhere
in the organisation. A clinical service needs to expand capacity quickly and estates are being asked whether space can be reconfigured to support it. It is the sort of request that understandably lands on estates teams across the NHS every day.
A familiar scenario None of these decisions are trivial. All of them will affect patients, staff, and the organisation’s ability to deliver care safely. The day, of course, has already been busy. Meetings about projects already under way. Operational issues that could not wait. A steady flow of calls and messages from colleagues who – quite reasonably – assume estates will have the answers. Alongside these immediate demands sits a different
set of strategic questions. How should the estate evolve over the next decade? How can it support new models of care, earlier intervention, and services delivered closer to people’s homes? And what does the future role of the existing acute estate need to be as services change? Those questions require a broader strategic lens. Estates
leaders must not only respond to the immediate pressures of today’s estate, but also help create the physical environment that enables tomorrow’s models of care. Yet, like many estates leaders across the NHS, the
environment in which decisions are made often leaves little space to step back and address them. Across the NHS there is extraordinary commitment and
professionalism within estates, facilities and capital teams working under sustained pressure. The challenge is not a lack of effort or intent. The challenge is that the system in which decisions are made often favours the urgent over the strategic. And yet the role of the estate is becoming more important than ever. For many estates leaders across the NHS, that scenario will feel deeply familiar.
The expanding complexity of NHS Estates For simplicity, the term ‘estates’ is used throughout this article to refer to the wider estates, facilities, and capital delivery functions that collectively manage the NHS estate. The scale and complexity of estates portfolios has
been evolving over many years. Ageing infrastructure, compliance requirements, operational pressures, and service transformation programmes are all competing for attention within the same system. Across the NHS, estates portfolios vary widely in scale and composition. Some organisations manage a single major hospital site, while others oversee estates that span multiple hospitals, community facilities, and a wide range of supporting infrastructure. In almost every case the estate has evolved over decades, shaped by previous service models and successive waves of investment. Each part of that estate brings its own operational risks, investment requirements, and strategic questions. At the same time expectations of estates teams have
expanded. Alongside maintaining safe and compliant environments, estates leaders are expected to support service transformation, enable new models of care, and contribute to wider organisational priorities such as
June 2026 Health Estate Journal 53
The Acute Assessment Unit (AAU) at Airedale General Hospital.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72
