search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INNOVATION | WEEE


Engineering plastics from WEEE: Separation challenge Polymers


ABS PS


ABS FR PS FR PC


PC/ABS PS/PPE PP PE PA PVC


Others


Technology Density


NIR Electrostatic


X-ray transmission Hand-held SSS/MIR


Unisensor laser spectroscopy XRF, LIBS, others Source: Fraunhofer IVV


Report, Electrolux said its use of recycled plastics had dropped to 5,600 tonnes in 2017. This is a reminder that the path to greater use of WEEE plas- tics is not straightforward. There is clearly a need for more work amongst


Below: A CloseWEEE project workshop at Gaiker’s facilities in Zamudio, Spain


recyclers and process technology developers to find solutions to the sector’s issues. “There is still research demand in this field,” said Martin Schlum- mer from Fraunhofer IVV. A major demand is for improved quality of the material to meet the expectations of OEM manufacturers wanting recyclate to replace virgin plastics. “There are many recycled grades on the market that are not good enough, so we have to improve it,” he said. Other development targets for the industry include: increasing yields to more than 60% of the recycled plastics in the raw material; focusing more on engineering plastics such as PC, ABS and PA; and producing compounds tailored to customers’ needs.


One of the biggest multi-partner projects in


Europe is CloseWEEE, funded by the EU’s Horizon 2020 programme, which is seeking solutions to problems of WEEE plastics recycling. Partners in the project are Fraunhofer IVV, Fraunhofer IZM, Coolrec, Gaiker, Tomra and Philips. Existing technologies for recycling WEEE plastics focus on polymers which are free of halogenated flame retardants, which neglects valuable materials such as PC-ABS. The project uses Tomra’s X-ray transmis- sion technology as its starting point to separate polymers, as the technology can produce a fraction of halogen-free polymers. This enables PC-ABS containing halogenated flame retardants to become concentrated into a fraction, and subse- quent sorting by a sink and float method enriches PC/ABS further to a purity of 80%. The CloseWEEE project has investigated the use


of the CreaSolv solvent process to purify fractions from mixed WEEE plastics streams (CreaSolv is also being used for recycling of PVC and multi-layer pack- aging). The process steps are: dissolution, purifica- tion, precipitation and drying. “The good news is that we can not only remove contaminants like copper, but we can also take out flame retardants,” said Schlummer. The result is a granule that is “very close to virgin”, he said. In an example he gave of mixed ABS and polystyrene containing flame retardants, the CreaSolv process results in two outputs: PS and ABS, both still containing antimony trioxide from the flame retardant which is then removed in a centrifuge, leaving the polymers in a purified state. Optical sorting technologies can be used in the sorting of WEEE polymers, but one of the limita-


30 PLASTICS RECYCLING WORLD | March/April 2018 www.plasticsrecyclingworld.com Chances


Enrichment of polymer types and grades (eg BFR and BFR-free)


Separation by polymer type. Industrial availability


Separation of ABS and PS from BFR-free density fraction


Separation of BFR and BFR-free Separation by polymer type


Separation by polymer type. Industrial availability. Separation of black


Separation of BFR and BFR-free


Limitations


Unspecific High material diversity in heavy fractions


No separation of black plastics No separation of BFR and BFR-free


Only mixtures of limited compositions No separation of BFR


No separation by polymer type


Not automatic No separation of BFR and BFR-free No separation of BFR and BFR-free


Limited industrial availability. Not state of the art


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48