search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NPE 2018 | MATERIALS REVIEW


Right: Shell had a big presence at NPE in Orlando


Shell Polymers – which has just commenced construction of a 1.6m tpa PE plant in Pennsylvania in the US – had a big presence at NPE 2018, underlin- ing the transformational effect the shale industry has had on the North American petrochemicals market. Shell has not produced polyolefins in North America since 2005, when it sold its stake in the Basell joint venture with BASF (the business was merged two years later into LyondellBasell). However, the attractive economics of shale have tempted the company back. Located in Beaver County, 45km north-west of


Pittsburgh, the project includes an ethane cracker and three PE polymerisation units that will produce HDPE and LLDPE grades. Construction began in the fourth quarter of last year with the first products set to reach the market in the early 2020s. Shell Polymers Business Integration Lead Michael Marr explained at the show that the decision to site the facility in Pennsylvania, close to the huge Marcellus and Utica shale fields, rather than on the Gulf Coast is intended to maximise the benefits of the new resource. “Our thought was to put the plant closer to the shale fields and to the market,” he said. “70% of the North American PE market is within 700 miles.” Marr said the company’s purpose at NPE was to identify new potential customers for the new facility, which will initially be focused on supplying the North American market. A decision to export further afield is yet to be made. RTP Company introduced its LT (Light and Tough)


series of PP, PA and PBT compounds that use glass sphere technology to achieve “drop-in” part weight savings of 5-10% with minimal loss of mechanicals compared to traditional glass reinforced grades. Senior Product Development Engineer Structural


Products Karl Hoppe said the new grades have resulted from developments in the strength of the


glass spheres and optimisation of the compound- ing process, which has minimised their breakage. “Previously with spheres we focused on maximis- ing the weight saving but you lost the properties,” Hoppe said. “The LT compounds are targeting the same properties that customers want with 30% glass filled PP or PA.” The LT materials provide similar weight savings


to that possible by using chemical foaming additives but there are no issues with developing an even cell structure and the surface finish is much more consistent, Hoppe said. Shrinkage of the new compounds is also broadly similar to current 30% glass reinforced grades, so a drop-in substitution is possible in many cases. Hoppe said RTP is aiming the new grades at


applications such as automotive and electrical connectors but also in hand held appliances such


Power tools are a potential application area for RTP’s new reduced density LT Series compounds


Tensile strength and density values of RTP’s LT Series PP, PA66 and PBY compounds compared to 30% glass reinforced alternatives Source: RTP Company 2018


36 INJECTION WORLD | May 2018 www.injectionworld.com


PHOTO: RTP COMPANY


PHOTO: AMI


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62