search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EDITOR’S TAKE


Student Transportation Safety Is No Game


Written by Ryan Gray | ryan@stnonline.com F


all is here, the season of great competition. This month, the World Series pits the best baseball teams from the American and National Leagues against each other. College football and the NFL


are in full swing. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is announcing the winners of this summer’s Clean School Bus Program competitive grant. A new school bus mechanic and inspector training competi- tion rolls out in Colorado. And next month, the roadeo returns to the TSD Conference in Frisco, Texas. As Taylor Ekbatani reports, starting on page 18, school


district transportation departments are either reeling or reveling, following the school startup crunch. She writes about a couple of districts that took a punch to the nose with late routes exacerbated by the driver shortage and technology failures as well as a couple of districts that not only survived the first days of school but thrived. The hiring and retaining of school bus drivers, me-


chanics, dispatchers, routers, trainers—directors of transportation—has become perhaps the greatest com- petition school districts have faced in decades (alongside teacher and principal shortages, of course). The leading industry opponents when it comes to potential drivers include Amazon, FedEx, UPS and an ever-growing stable of rideshare companies that flout big sign-on bonuses and promises of guaranteed hours, at least the flexibility of applicants to choose their own. The easy response to commercial package delivery


services is that school buses transport the most precious cargo, a fact that resonates with those who deeply care for children and want to positively impact their educa- tions and futures. But rideshare options abound, more specifically transportation network companies, or TNCs, and similar yet very different alternative transportation companies. These differences can result in competing public utility


commission regulations that govern TNCs and the state and federal regulations that govern alternative transpor- tation companies for transporting students. The National Congress on School Transportation is seeking to level that playing field with a writing committee on alternative transportation that began forming this summer. Perhaps the better name would have been the writing committee on non-school bus transportation, as more


10 School Transportation News • OCTOBER 2023


districts are operating sedans and minivans to transport students with IEPs or who are experiencing homeless- ness. Regardless, the group is charged with developing guidelines for state delegates to vote on in May 2025, for inclusion in the National School Bus Specifications & Procedures. Speakers at the TSD Conference next month will discuss what some of those could be. This is heresy to the school bus purists. What about the school bus safety record? Meanwhile, school buses are sky- rocketing in price, and school districts can’t find drivers. Something has to give. The NCST deliberations in Des


Moines, Iowa, are sure to be action-packed. NASDPTS, which organizes the event, should sell tickets. No matter what side of the new great debate you are


on—don’t worry, school bus seatbelts will be a hot topic at both the NAPT Annual Conference later this month and at the NASDPTS Annual Conference next—everyone can agree that student transportation has changed and will continue to change. While the outward appearance of school buses


remains the same to the untrained eye, the technolo- gy inside is worlds apart from what Frank Cyr and his peers discussed during that first NCST in 1939, when the little red schoolhouse was the brand icon of a public education. Today, we have electric school buses, GPS that tells us where the vehicles and children are in real time, AI-powered intelligent routing, predictive camera systems and sensors, collision mitigation systems, etc. They would all be unfathomable to Cyr, the father of the yellow school bus. That first NCST meeting at Teachers College, Co- lumbia University in New York City, underwritten by the Rockefeller Foundation and at the time merely a conference—65 years later the event was renamed to Congress—created National School Bus Yellow, a revolu- tionary idea at the time and not without its fair share of debate. But ever since, yellow school buses have become a universal symbol for children and learning everywhere. Seventy-five years from now, what will that icon be? ●


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60