HEALTH, SAFETY & WELLBEING TECH IT UP A NOTCH
How can you get to a better onboarding compliance situation than you have now, asks Paul Rapuano, from workplace safety systems supplier Rapid.
Why is it important that all workplace personnel are compliant? Ultimately, it’s down to your responsibility as a business partner and employer. If you have invited someone to work with you, if only for a day, then you need to both protect them from harm as much as you can and also your organisation from the fallout of any potential workplace accidents. It’s also very important to ensure standards are up to scratch across all parts of your operation, from food hygiene preparation or how well your people are trained on performing any key physical or manual processes on-site.
This is about taking responsibility for all the stakeholders you need to care about. The problem is that today, and really for employees, contractors, and visitors alike, most organisations manage visitor or site participation compliance using separate systems or manual processes.
I can understand that it once made sense to start off doing all this with a paper log and then an Excel spreadsheet. But this is no longer an efficient approach, as having multiple individual, unintegrated systems means you can very quickly end up with an incomplete view of all that’s going on in your environment.
Why would that be a problem? Because you’re never really going to know 100% of the time if you have any inconsistent vetting, delays in onboarding, expired credentials going unnoticed, and/or any potential gaps in your team safety training. Without a unified view, across all industry sectors, you’re not applying the same compliance standards across all workforce types, and so potentially increase the possibility of audit failures, heightened risk or legal and even reputational exposure.
"Having multiple individual, unintegrated systems means you can very quickly end up with an incomplete view of all that’s going on in your environment."
Whatever happens, you don’t want those two ever cropping up. Many workplace injuries involve people who’ve been on-site for less than six months, and many of these accidents involve contractors or temporary workers. Inadequate or missed inductions increase the likelihood of safety incidents, and inconsistent delivery of workplace safety best practice almost by definition means your staff don’t always get the same training.
38 | TOMORROW’S FM
These are strong arguments for an evolution away from fragmented or manual onboarding processes for all the different types of people you want to have on-site at any one time: there is no justification for raising your risk profile. But there are also a strong operational efficiency reason that are positive drivers versus these ‘negative’ ones for consolidated/centralised onboarding: manual onboarding is time-intensive (it often happens in situ, taking people away from their jobs and I’ve seen estimates that it can take three times longer than doing it online/digitally).
"Many workplace injuries involve people who’ve been on-site for less than six months"
I’ve mentioned what I think is a better way of doing this, and it’s time that I got more explicit about what I mean. Increasingly, the use of not just cloud but AI technology is making registering contractor companies easier than ever before, as well as much more complete, accurate, and easy to update and check.
For example, we work with customers who use our systems to invite and register contractor companies and induct workers online, meaning contractors can complete their inductions in their own time from anywhere. We also see organisations using us to create customised induction courses for the different groups of visitors or team members they want to protect.
The system can also capture photo ID, enabling workplaces to use facial recognition at access points to automatically identify individuals and ensure only inducted personnel are granted entry, i.e. employing AI computer vision. Then there’s the issue of document tracking and checking; for contractors, proof of insurance documents, for example, public liability and professional indemnity, are things you need to check and verify. Again, doing that by hand or in a closed system is an administrative headache and requires a lot of attention to detail to ensure things like the insured amount and expiry date are correct.
But with smart software helping do the heavy lifting, documents that contractors upload as part of their onboarding can be automatically verified in seconds. Modern onboarding systems can even auto-correct minor errors in key fields, such as a mistyped expiry date or
twitter.com/TomorrowsFM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60
