Photo shows: The tipping hall facility before, and the new waste chute being installed.
What changed was not simply the choice of material, but the way the chute was engineered and specified. The chute was treated as a critical engineered component rather than a passive structure.
Moving away from reactive repair This example reflects a wider challenge across the sector. Wear protection is often considered late in the asset lifecycle, once problems have already escalated. Decisions are often driven by urgency rather than long- term performance.
An engineered wear-protection system considers the operating environment from the outset. Factors such as the composition and variability of the waste stream, moisture levels and corrosion exposure, impact and abrasion characteristics, and the required flow behaviour all influence material selection and chute geometry. Practical considerations around access and installation also play a role, particularly in live waste and recycling environments where downtime must be carefully managed.
By matching material selection to these conditions, facilities can stabilise performance and extend asset life. While engineered replacements may involve a higher upfront cost than patch repair, it often delivers better value over the asset's lifecycle.
Reduced downtime, fewer callouts and lower safety exposure quickly offset the initial investment.
Planning proactive upgrades in
live facilities One perceived barrier to proactive wear protection is the downtime it entails. In practice, many upgrades can be designed, fabricated and installed within planned maintenance windows or shutdowns.
www.tomorrowsfm.com
Early identification of wear-related issues is critical. Changes in waste flow behaviour, an increase in the frequency of blockages, visible surface pitting or thinning, and the appearance of exposed steel or rebar are all indicators that performance is being compromised. A growing reliance on manual clearance is often the clearest sign that surface condition has deteriorated beyond what routine maintenance can manage.
Recognising these signs allows facilities teams to plan upgrades rather than react to failures. In live environments, this planning approach supports operational continuity while gradually improving asset resilience.
Treating wear as an engineering discipline Wear is often accepted as an unavoidable consequence of handling waste. In reality, it is a predictable engineering challenge. When addressed early, through appropriate material selection and system design, its impact can be significantly reduced.
For FMs, the question is not whether wear will occur, but how to manage it. Treating wear protection as an engineered system rather than a reactive repair strategy leads to safer, more reliable operations.
Waste facilities will always operate in aggressive environments. Assets such as tipping chutes’ performance directly influences safety, availability and day-to-day operational efficiency. Addressing wear at the design level allows plants to focus on what they are meant to do: operate continuously, safely and predictably.
www.kingfisher-industrial.com/market-sectors/ recycling/
TOMORROW’S FM | 23
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48
