RESEARCH REPORT Rubbermaid Commercial Products (RCP) has published the first snapshot of the findings of one of the largest ever commercially funded quantitative studies into business recycling and waste management across Europe.

The ground-breaking research is the cornerstone of the brand’s innovative new ‘Love Recycling’ initiative, which will continue to report throughout 2020.

Recycling and waste management are two of the most important – though often overlooked – challenges facing today’s businesses. The research project’s objective is to provide the industry with a snapshot of how businesses, large and small, are dealing with their waste – and, most importantly, what the barriers are to further improving commercial recycling. The intention is to provide the stimulus to educate and improve recycling in the workplace.

Whilst most of the 800+ businesses

that have contributed so far report having some recycling and waste management policies and practices in place, the research points to real opportunities for businesses to do more – provided they can get the right information, education and support from government.

Amongst some key findings from the research to date are:

• 73% of businesses across Europe feel that their recycling efforts are not always successful.

• Over two-thirds of European businesses say poor or non-existent processes or facilities impact how much they recycle. Over 25% admit this problem is very or extremely influential in holding back their recycling efforts.

• Business needs more government support. Nearly 30% of UK businesses feel a lack of government incentives stops them from doing more. One in 10 feel poor government intervention is an extremely significant bar to progress.


• Europe-wide, 90% of businesses feel the government needs to do more to encourage commercial recycling.

• A third of European companies feel a lack of government support influences their ability to recycle more. Of this group, 25% feel it is extremely influential.

• 64% of European businesses worry how much the cost of recycling more could impact their bottom line.

• This concern about costs is greater in France and Germany where it is an extremely influential brake on doing more for over 10% of businesses.

• Amongst other barriers, one in three businesses blame low levels of staff training as a barrier to greater recycling success. This is felt most strongly in Germany, where 39% of businesses see this as an issue.

• It’s not all bad news – 82% of businesses feel that recycling will become an area of greater focus for them in the next few years.

• More than four-fifths of them (83%) plan to spend more on recycling solutions in the future.

Paul Jakeway, Head of Marketing for EMEA at RCP, said: “Businesses across Europe in every sector are already recycling, and most state

they either want to or are planning to do more to improve this. But it’s clear there is a lot more that can be done to make waste management easier and more sustainable.

“Our research highlights a real gap in commercial recycling understanding – there’s a real need for education. Commercial enterprise needs help, support and expert advice on how to deal better with its waste; how to train its frontline staff, and how to change the way recycling is perceived internally so it becomes more of an investment and less of a cost. That support needs to go hand–in–hand with funding for better infrastructure, making it easy for commercial organisations to do the right thing.

Promoted via a large-scale social media campaign, RCP’s ‘Love Recycling’ initiative sampled over 800 businesses across Europe, of different sizes and from all sectors, using an online questionnaire in English, French and German.

The report, called ‘The Changing Face of Commercial Recycling in Europe’ is now available as a free download from the website below. A personalised copy of the data will also be sent to all survey participants over the coming days. This will allow them to compare their own responses to those of the sample as a whole.

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62