search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MICROSCOPY & IMAGING


between the cantilever/tip-system and the sample at varying sample biases with the aid of a current-voltage preamplifier. Since C-AFM is a contact mode AFM method, the use of soft cantilevers with low spring constants is advantageous to minimise tip wear or sample damage. Tis article compares C-AFM


measurements on the TMD-material molybdenum disulfide (MoS2


) in air


and in a high vacuum environment of less than 1 · 10-5 Torr achieved by the Park NX-Hivac AFM (Fig. 1). Generally, a thin layer of water forms on surfaces in ambient conditions, which can reduce the quality and sensitivity of the conductivity measurement in cAFM. Additionally, water induces a p-doping in MoS2


, therefore limiting the electrical conductivity of the material.


ON MOS2 Fig. 2 summarises topography measurements on three MoS2


ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY samples


with different layer thicknesses: one sample with 1-2 MoS2


sample with 3-4 MoS2 layers (b), layers (a), one


and another multi-layer sample with pyramidal surface structures (c). Te 1-2-layer sample consists of one closed MoS2


Fig. 3. Direct comparison of cAFM measurement in air and in high vacuum on a 3-4-layer sample. a) and b) topography, c) and d) current signal. Scale bars are 500nm


monolayer with additional single- additional single-layer islands. Figure 2d


layered islands, featuring a step height of 0.6 nm – the layer thickness of a single monolayer. Te islands represent the onset of the growth of the second layer and can be recognised in Fig. 2 as bright regions in the topography. Similarly, the 3-4-layer sample comprises a closed three-layered MoS2


film with


schematically shows the basic structure of the 3-4-layer sample as well as the C-AFM experimental setup for the following measurements. Here, each green layer represents one MoS2


monolayer, while


the grey arrangement on the left side is the electrical contact required to apply of the sample bias during the C-AFM


measurement. Te multi-layered MoS2 sample differs strongly from the former in its surface structure. Tis sample exhibits three-dimensional (3D) pyramid-shaped


features on top of a closed 3-layer MoS2 film. Te formation of the pyramid-


AFM imaged steps in the topography of the 1-2-layer and 3-4-layer samples that run diagonally across both images in Fig 2a and b. Tese lines originate from the terrace structure of the underlying sapphire substrate, which the AFM detected through the MoS2


films.


However, the height of the steps allows a clear distinction between sapphire terraces and MoS2


steps: While the


characteristic step height on the c-plane of the sapphire substrate is 0.2nm, a monolayer MoS2


has a thickness of


0.6nm. Te height profile in Fig. 2e visualised the different step heights of the substrate and the MoS2


sample.


Fig. 4. cAFM measurement in high vacuum on 1-2-layer sample. a) sample topography and b) current signal. Scale bars are 500nm


68 www.scientistlive.com


CONDUCTIVITY IN AIR AND HIGH VACUUM To demonstrate the advantageous effects of high vacuum on the quality of C-AFM, comparative measurements in air and in vacuum <1·10-5


Torr were carried out on the same sample with the same


shaped features originates from a change of the growth mechanism from layer- by-layer to a 3D growth at thicknesses beyond 4 layers. In addition to the MoS2


islands, the


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72