SPECTROSCOPY
EXPLORING PY-GC-MS
Daniela Peroni discusses pyrolysis-GC×GC-MS for easier and more effective analysis of additives in polypropylene (PP)
When pyrolysed, Irganox 1010 and Irgafos
168 break down to several aromatic fragments that can be used as markers. Te figure below shows an example of py-GC×GC analysis with pyrolysis at 750°C for 15 seconds. Te 2D pyrogram of sample B clearly
shows the benefits of the enhanced chromatographic resolution. Te aromatic markers are separated from the aliphatics generated by the PP matrix, so they can be found with a simple and quick workflow based on integration and library search. All target markers are successfully detected also in sample A, which has a lower content (especially for Irganox 1010, 250ppm or 0.025% w/w).
Sample A and examples of NIST library search for targeted pyrolysis markers and an untargeted UV light stabiliser
yrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (py-GC-MS) is a powerful technique for polymer characterisation. Pyrolysis thermally decomposes the material into smaller units (e.g. monomers, dimers) suitable for GC- MS. Te degradation profiles, or pyrograms, elucidate polymeric composition and structure. On the other hand, due to the elevated complexity the profiling of minor yet key components such as additives (e.g. antioxidants, light stabilisers, plasticisers) is often challenging. Comprehensive 2D gas chromatography (GC×GC) combines two separation mechanisms to achieve superior separation power. Coupling pyrolysis to
P
GC×GC can allow for easier and more confident additives profiling in polymers. Here, we present as case study the py- GC×GC-MS analysis of polypropylene (PP) materials with different additive content.
EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS PP samples: material A (Irganox 1010: 0.025%, Irgafos 168: 0.11%) and B (Irganox 1010: 0.8%, Irgafos 168: 0.1%). Measurements are performed with a CDS
5200 Pyroprobe coupled to an Agilent 7890B GC equipped with a Zoex ZX2 thermal modulator and an Agilent 5975C MSD with Triple-Axis Detector. Data is processed with GC Image.
Confident identity confirmation is possible thanks to the clean spectra obtained as a result of the good separation (see figure on the left). In addition to the targets, other additives can be detected and identified in both samples with relative ease and satisfactory confidence. Te peak capacity offered by GC×GC, in combination with the consequent spectral quality not compromised by co-elution, are in fact ideal features for general screening. Tese results are a very significant
improvement compared to standard py-GC- MS. Te automated search for the markers by deconvolution in the 1D pyrogram is not successful. Te reasons for this are the poor response and the co-elution with the much more abundant and complex aliphatic group, which make the task highly challenging at best. Te additives can be found by searching manually for known selective mass fragments and assessing the presence of consistent MS pattern, which relies heavily on the operator, making it time-consuming and laborious. In summary, Py-GC×GC-MS is a very
powerful tool for the analysis of additives in polymeric materials. Targets can be found in an automated way. Te aromatic fragments are efficiently separated and identified with good confidence. Finally, the number of peaks fully resolved makes it possible to find and identify potentially interesting unknowns.
2D pyrogram for sample B with illustrative identification of some markers for the target additives
Daniela Peroni is with JSB
www.go-jsb.com
www.scientistlive.com 35
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72
