Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:264–269.
21. Price L, MacDonald J, Melone L, et al. Effectiveness of national and sub- national infection prevention and control interventions in high and upper-middle income countries: outcomes of a systematic literature review. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:e159–e171.
22. Search filters. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network website.
http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html. Published 2013. Accessed January 11, 2018.
23. Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, et al. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;69:225–234.
24. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC Research Methods Programme website.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.178.3100& rep=rep1&type=pdf. Published 2006. Accessed January 11, 2018.
25. Cherry MG, Brown JM, Bethell GS, Neal T, Shaw NJ. Features of educational interventions that lead to compliance with hand hygiene in healthcare professionals within a hospital care setting. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 22. Med Teach 2012;34:e406–e420.
26. Doronina O, Jones D, Martello M, Biron A, Lavoie-Tremblay M. A systematic review on the effectiveness of interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance of nurses in the hospital setting. J Nurs Scholarsh 2017;49:143–152.
27. Gould DJ, Moralejo D, Drey N, Chudleigh JH, Taljaard M. Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;9:CD005186.
28. Huis A, van Achterberg T, de Bruin M, Grol R, Schoonhoven L, Hulscher M. A systematic review of hand hygiene improvement strategies: a behavioural approach. Implement Sci 2012;7:92.
29. Kingston L, O’Connell NH, Dunne CP, O’Connell NH. Hand hygiene- related clinical trials reported since 2010: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2016;92:309–320.
30. Luangasanatip N, Hongsuwan M, Limmathurotsakul D, et al. Comparative efficacy of interventions to promote hand hygiene in hospital: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2015;351: h3728.
31. Mitchell MD, Betesh J, Ravitz N, Runyan D, Umscheid CA. Automated Hand Hygiene Monitoring Systems. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Evidence- based Practice, 2014.
32. Neo JRJ, Sagha-Zadeh R, Vielemeyer O, Franklin E. Evidence-based practices to increase hand hygiene compliance in health care facilities: an integrated review. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:691–704.
33. Ofek Shlomai N, Rao S, Patole S. Efficacy of interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in neonatal units: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015;34:887–897.
34. Picheansathian W. A systematic review on the effectiveness of alcohol- based solutions for hand hygiene. Int J Nurs Pract 2004;10:3–9.
35. Ranji SR, Shetty K, Posley KA, et al. Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infections. Vol 6 of Shojania KG, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, and Owens DK (editors). Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies. Technical Review 9 (Prepared by the Stanford University-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center under Con- tract No. 290-02-0017). AHRQ Publication No. 04(07)-0051-6. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2007. https://www.
ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/qualgap6/hainfgap.pdf. Published 2007. Accessed January 11, 2018.
36. Ritchie K, Iqbal K, Macpherson K, Riches E, Stout A. The provision of alcohol based products to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Healthcare Improvement Scotland website.
http://www.healthcareimpro-
vementscotland.org/previous_resources/hta_report/hta_7.aspx. Published 2005. Accessed January 11, 2018.
37. Stout A, Ritchie K, Macpherson K. Clinical effectiveness of alcohol-based products in increasing hand hygiene compliance and reducing infection rates: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2007;66:308–312.
38. Schweizer ML, Reisinger HS, Ohl M, et al. Searching for an optimal hand hygiene bundle: A meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2014;58:248–259.
1455
39. Srigley JA, Corace K, Hargadon DP, et al. Applying psychological frameworks of behaviour change to improve healthcare worker hand hygiene: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2015;91:202–210.
40. Srigley JA, Gardam M, Fernie G, Lightfoot D, Lebovic G, Muller MP. Hand hygiene monitoring technology: a systematic review of efficacy. J Hosp Infect 2015;89:51–60.
41. Stiller A, Salm F, Bischoff P, Gastmeier P. Relationship between hospital design and healthcare-associated infection rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2016;5:51.
42. Vindigni SM, Riley PL, Jhung M. Systematic review: handwashing behaviour in low- to middle-income countries: outcome measures and behaviour maintenance. Trop Med Int Health 2011;16:466–477.
43. Ward MA, Schweizer ML, Polgreen PM, Gupta K, Reisinger HS, Perencevich EN. Automated and electronically assisted hand hygiene monitoring systems: a systematic review. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:472–478.
44. Cheung A, Weir W, Mayhew A, Kozloff N, Brown K, Grimshaw J. Overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of reminders in improving healthcare professional behavior. Syst Rev 2012;1:36.
45. Lorimer K, Kidd L, Lawrence M, McPherson K, Cayless S, Cornish F. Systematic review of reviews of behavioural HIV prevention interventions among men who have sex with men. AIDS Care 2012;25:133–150.
46. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation Care. What study designs should be included in an EPOC review and what should they be called? EPOC Resources for review authors website.
http://epoc.cochrane.org/ sites/
epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Resources-for-authors2017/ what_study_designs_should_be_included_in_an_epoc_review.pdf. Pub- lished 2017. Accessed January 11, 2018.
47. Chudleigh J, Drey N, Moralejo D, Gould DJ. Systematic reviews of hand hygiene in patient care post 2010. J Hosp Infect 2016;94:110–111.
48. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation Care. Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. EPOC Resources for review authors website.
http://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/ Resources-for-authors2017/suggested_risk_of_bias_criteria_for_epoc_re- views.pdf. Published 2107. Accessed January 11, 2018.
49. Zingg W, Castro-Sanchez E, Secci FV, et al. Innovative tools for quality assessment: integrated quality criteria for review of multiple study designs (ICROMS). Public Health 2016;133:19–37.
50. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. University of Ottawa website.
http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epi- demiology/
oxford.asp Published 2000. Accessed January 11, 2018.
51. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomizedclinical trials: isblindingnecessary?ControlClinTrials 1996;17:1–12.
52. Rosella L, Bowman C, Pach B, Morgan S, Fitzpatrick T, Goel V. The development and validation of a meta-tool for quality appraisal of public health evidence: meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT). Public Health 2016;136:57–65.
53. Anderson LA, Sharpe PA. Improving patient and provider communica- tion: A synthesis and review of communication interventions. Patient Educ Couns 1991;17:99–134.
54. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non- randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:377–384.
55. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration website.
http://handbook.cochrane. org/ Published 2011. Accessed January 11, 2018.
56. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination website.
http://www.york.ac.uk/ crd/guidance/. Published 2009. Accessed January 11, 2018.
57. Higgins JPT,Green
S.Cochranehandbookfor systematic reviewsof interventions Version5.1.0 (updatedMarch2011).TheCochraneCollaboration website. http://
handbook.cochrane.org/. Published 2011. Accessed January 11, 2018.
58. SIGN 50: A guideline developer’s handbook. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network website.
http://www.sign.ac.uk/sign- 50.html. Published 2015. Accessed January 11, 2018.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124
