search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
1500 Table 1. List of Antimicrobial Agents Approved Before and After the GAIN Act


Year 2006


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


2015


2016 2017


2018b


No. of Antimicrobials Approved


2


0 0 1 2 1


2a


2 7


2


2 4 1


Antibiotics Approved None


None None


Telavancin


Ceftaroline, gatifloxacin ophthalmic solution Fidaxomicin Bedaquilinea Telavancin


Dalbavancin, oritavancin, tedizolid, ceftolozane-tazobactam, finafloxacin otic suspension


Ceftazidime-avibactam, None


Antifungals Approved


Anidulafungin, posaconazole


None None None None None None


Luliconazole


Efinaconazole, tavaborole


Isavuconazonium sulfate


None


Delafloxacin, meropenem-vaborbactam, ozenoxacin, secnidazole None Plazomycin


aBedaquiline and raxibacumab were both FDA approved after July 9, 2012. bAs of May 8, 2018.


the drugs provide value for money. Value-based pricing is a method that could be used to determine a price for new anti- bacterial agents at which these drugs provide value to the patient and health system rather than per the cost of the drug or his- torical prices.8,9 This VBP reflects an assessment of the com- parative effectiveness of the drug compared to other available treatments. An important factor will be the definition of “value,” which might also include other factors than the impact of the drug on patient health, that is, wider social impact and the health impact of disease.8 In conclusion, although the GAIN Act has been a laudable


initiative aiming to reduce the devastating burden of anti- microbial resistance, substantial barriers remain. Accordingly, there is a need for new policies that incorporate the CIP to incentivize antibiotics innovation and create better solutions for the devastating burden of antimicrobial resistance. Equally important, VBP of the new antibiotics is essential throughout the innovative process.


Acknowledgments. None to disclose. Financial support. No financial support was provided relevant to this article.


Conflicts of interest. The author reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.


References


1. WHO.WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. World Health Organization 2017;27 February 2017 News Release GENEVA. (http://www.who.int/en/news-room/detail/27-02-2017-who-pub lishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed).


2. CDC fact sheet: antibiotic/antimicrobial resistance. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/index. html. Published 2017. Accessed September 17, 2018.


3. Generating antibiotic incentives now. Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act Public Law 112-144, Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.fda.gov/down loads/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/ CDER/UCM595188.pdf. Published 2012. Accessed September 17, 2018.


4. Morse SS. Factors in the emergence of infectious diseases. Emerg Infect Dis 1995;1:7–15.


5. Weiss RA, McMichael AJ. Social and environmental risk factors in the emergence of infectious diseases. Nat Med 2004;10:S70–S76.


6. Simpkin VL, Renwick MJ, Kelly R, Mossialos E. Incentivising innovation in antibiotic drug discovery and development: progress, challenges and next steps. J Antibiot 2017;70:1087–1096.


7. Mueller-Langer F. Neglected infectious diseases: are push and pull incentive mechanisms suitable for promoting drug development research? Health Econ Policy Law 2013;8:185–208.


8. Verhoef TI, Morris S. Cost-effectiveness and pricing of antibacterial drugs. Chem Biol Drug Des 2015;85:4–13.


9. Robinson JC, Howell S, Pearson SD. Value-based pricing and patient access for specialty drugs. JAMA 2018;319:2169–2170.


None


Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Pathogenic Bacterial or Fungal Agents


None


None None None None None


Raxibacumaba None None


None


Bezlotoxumab, Obiltoxaximab None None


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124