1448
20. Swaminathan L, Flanders S, Rogers M, et al. Improving PICC use and outcomes in hospitalised patients: an interrupted time series study using MAGIC criteria. BMJ Qual Saf 2018;27:271–278.
21. Weeks KR, Hsu YJ, Yang T, Sawyer M, Marsteller JA. Influence of a multifaceted intervention on central line days in intensive care units: results of a national multisite study. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:S197–S202.
22. Au AK, Rotte MJ, Grzybowski RJ, Ku BS, Fields JM. Decrease in central venous catheter placement due to use of ultrasound guidance for peripheral intravenous catheters. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:1950–1954.
23. Galen BT, Southern WN. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters to reduce central venous catheter use on the inpatient medical ward. Qual Manag Health Care 2018;27:30–32.
24. Mccarthy M, Al TK. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access program is associated with a marked reduction in central venous catheter use in noncritically ill emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med 2013;61:198–203.
25. Grady D. A Simple Approach to reducing inappropriate use of central venous catheters. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1234.
26. Ilan R, Doan J, Cload B, Squires M, Day A. Removing nonessential central venous catheters: evaluation of a quality improvement intervention. Can J Anaesth 2012;59:1102–1110.
27. Seguin P, Laviolle B, Isslame S, Coue A, Malledant Y. Effectiveness of simple daily sensitization of physicians to the duration of central venous and urinary tract catheterization. Intensive Care Med 2010;36:1202–1206.
28. Rattanaumpawan P, Teeratorn N, Thamlikitkul V. A Cluster-randomized controlled trial of the catheter reminder and evaluation program. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:231–233.
29. Chopra V, Govindan S, Kuhn L, et al. Do clinicians know which of their patients have central venous catheters? A multicenter observational study. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:562–567.
30. Chopra V, Kuhn L, Ratz D, Flanders SA, Krein SL. Vascular nursing experience, practice knowledge, and beliefs: results from the Michigan PICC1 survey. J Hosp Med 2016;11:269–275.
Zhaoyu Xiong and Haiyan Chen
31. Climo M, Diekema D, Warren DK, et al. Prevalence of the use of central venous access devices within and outside of the intensive care unit: results of a survey among hospitals in the prevention epicenter program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:942–945.
32. Becerra MB, Shirley D, Safdar N. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of idle intravenous catheters: an integrative review. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:e167–e172.
33. Trick WE, Vernon MO, Welbel SF, Wisniewski MF, Jernigan JA, Weinstein RA. Unnecessary use of central venous catheters: the need to look outside the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:266–268.
34. Kara A, Johnson CS, Murray M, Dillon J, Hui SL. Can the identification of an idle line facilitate its removal? A comparison between a proposed guideline and clinical practice. J Hosp Med 2016;11:489–493.
35. Lee KH, Cho NH, Jeong SJ, Kim MN, Han SH, Song YG. Effect of central- line bundle compliance on central line-associated bloodstream infections. Yonsei Med J 2018;59:376.
36. Liang HW, Lin HL. Compliance with central-line insertion bundles in an intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:581–582.
37. Leung PO, Lin HL, Lai CC. Different compliance with central-line insertion bundle between intensivist and nonintensivist staff in intensive care units. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:601–603.
38. Osorio J, Álvarez D, Pacheco R, Gómez CA, Lozano A. Implementation of an insertion bundle for preventing central-line–associated bloodstream infections in an intensive care unit in Colombia. Rev Chilena Infect 2013;30:465–473.
39. Meddings J, Rogers MA, Krein SL, Fakih MG, Olmsted RN, Saint S. Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:277–289.
40. Liu YT, Alsaawi A, Bjornsson HM. Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials. Eur J Emerg Med 2014;21:18–23.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124
