search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
1222 infection control & hospital epidemiology october 2017, vol. 38, no. 10


figure 1. Percentage of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) colonization or infection among study patients, according to the score value of the prediction model.


the patients in the second stage of the study (Table 1). Of the 47 patients with positive clinical cultures for MDR-GNB isolates, 44 showed evidence of clinical infection. When the COP model was applied to the second-stage


patient set, the model showed satisfactory predictive perfor- mance in stratifying the risk of developing MDR-GNB infec- tion during hospitalization (AUC, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.74–0.87]) (Figure 1). High-risk patients (with scores ≥4 points) had a significantly higher cumulative probability of developing a MDR-GNB infection during hospitalization than low-risk patients (with scores<4 points) (log-rank test; P<.001) (Figure 2).


discussion


figure 2. Cumulative probability of occurrence of multidrug- resistant gram-negative bacterial (MDR-GNB) infection during hospitalization among 998-second stage study patients.


exposures, had a higher percentage of malignant or end-stage renal disease, and exhibited variation in the positive previous VRE culture history (Table 2). Only 47 (4.7%) patients had at least 1 positive MDR-GNB culture from clinical specimens throughout the entire hospitalization course. Klebsiella pneu- moniae (18 of 998; 1.8%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (11 of 998; 1.1%) were the predominant MDR-GNB isolates among


In this study, we developed and validated a scoring system, using clinical variables that were easily obtained upon ED admission to predict patient at risk of MDR-GNB coloniza- tion. Our prediction model effectively stratified MDR-GNB colonization risk among patients presenting from the com- munity without requiring prior culture results. In addition, our prediction model further showed a satisfactory degree of discrimination in stratifying patients with differences in the likelihood of contracting a MDR-GNB infection during hos- pitalization. Therefore, our prediction model is useful for first- line physicians and infection control specialists and can aid in the decision-making process regarding initial antimicrobial therapy or implementation of specific interventions to prevent the spread of antimicrobial-resistant organisms in the hospital. Antimicrobial-resistant GNB are important in the etiology


of nosocomial infections, accounting for a substantial pro- portion, and they pose important therapeutic challenges for first-line physicians.27–29 Although community-acquired


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144