differentiating hospitals with hai data 1171 Potential conflicts of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. D.J.M.
serves as a research consultant for Welch-Allyn, has presented a self-developed lecture for a 3M series on hospital infections, and receives travel support for conferences fromIDSA, SHEA, and ASM.
Address correspondence to Max Masnick, 10 S. Pine Street, MSTF 330, Baltimore, MD 21201 (
max@masnick.net).
supplementary material To view supplementary material for this article, please visit
https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2017.179
references
1. Healthcare-associated infection progress report: questions and answers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website.
http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/surveillance/QA_stateSummary.html #b9. Updated 2016. Accessed July 28, 2017.
2. Rock C, Thom KA, Harris AD, et al. A multicenter longitudinal study of hospital-onset bacteremia: time for a new quality outcome measure? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:143–148.
3. Healthcare-associated infections hospital data. US Medicare Services website.
https://data.medicare.gov/Hospital-Compare/ Healthcare-Associated-Infections-Hospital/77hc-ibv8/about. Accessed July 28, 2017.
4. Data by region. Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care website. http://
www.dartmouthatlas.org/data/region/. Updated 2017. Accessed July 28, 2017.
5. Soe MM. Compare 2 SIRs by exact binomial test and mid-P, 95% CI. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website.
http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/sas/binom.sas. Accessed October 24, 2016.
6. Fast Facts on US hospitals. American Hospital Association web- site.
http://www.aha.org/research/rc/stat-studies/fast-facts.shtml. Published 2013. Accessed July 28, 2017.
7. Safavi KC, Dai F, Gilbertsen TA, Schonberger RB. Variation in surgical quality measure adherence within hospital referral regions: do publicly reported surgical quality measures distin- guish among hospitals that patients are likely to compare? Health Serv Res 2014;49:1108–1120.
8. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144