search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
s.aureusinfections, 2006–2014 1233 table 3. Continued


Gentamicina No.


Year 2010


2011 2012 2013


2014, Q1


(% susceptible) 62 (100.0)


59 (100.0) 65 (100.0) 77 (100.0) 18 (100.0)


Erythromycin No.


(% susceptible) 44 (71.0)


44 (74.6) 51 (78.5) 56 (72.7) 12 (66.7)


SSTI, skin and soft tissue infection. aNo resistant isolates were observed for gentamicin. bSignificant decrease (P<0.05).


perhaps population-wide herd immunity to USA300 MRSA or another strain. Changes in HA MRSA incidence may reflect the efficacy of infection control procedures at UCM. Previous literature suggested that the 15-year-long wave of


CA MRSA activity in the United States7 peaked and started to decline by 2010.6,30 In both children and adults, an observa-


tional study of the Department of Defense TRICARE bene- ficiaries showed that the proportion of community-onset SSTIs caused by MRSA decreased from 62% in 2006 to 52% in 2010 (P<.001).6 Our study shows a similar trend continuing up to early 2014; as a proportion of MRSA, infections that were CA MRSA decreased significantly from 2006 to 2013, suggesting a reversal of the massive increase in CA MRSA proportion in the previous decade.7 In adults, MSSA and MRSA incidence densities exhibited


opposing trends at UCM from 2006 to 2013. While MRSA infection incidence density decreased, MSSA infection inci- dence density in adults increased on average by nearly 2% per year, which had not been demonstrated previously. In both adults and children, CA MRSA SSTIs significantly


declined during the study period, which is congruent with pre- vious findings.6 In contrast,MSSA SSTI incidence density rose in both children and adults at UCM. This finding may have important implications for empiric SSTI treatment because MSSA infections are preferably treated with a β-lactam antibiotic. Our results suggest that effective empiric antibiotic choices


may continue to narrow because both MRSA and MSSA SSTI and blood isolates are following a trend toward increasing resistance to orally available agents. Our study has certain limitations. We did not account for


changes that may have occurred in the practice of sending bacterial cultures from sites of infection at UCM during 2006– 2014. Additionally, data were not available on patient stays in long-term-care facilities; therefore, our criteria differed from CDC criteria for HA, HACO, and CA S. aureus infections. However, individuals who stayed in a long-term-care facility within the previous year likely had another risk factor that would classify them as being healthcare-exposed. Also, the


automated D-test after December 2008 was performed on clindamycin-susceptible isolates with erythromycin resistance or intermediate erythromycin susceptibility. In contrast, the earlier-used, manual D-test was only performed only on erythromycin-resistant isolates. Therefore, inducible clin- damycin resistance may have been more frequently detected after the change to the automated D-test. Finally, without medical record reviews, we were unable to exclude all S. aureus cultures obtained from sites of colonization. However, we did exclude S. aureus isolates that were explicitly obtained to assess for colonization. In conclusion, at UCM in 2006–2013, MRSA infection incidence decreased. However, we demonstrated an unantici- pated increase in MSSA infection incidence in adults overall and specifically in CA MSSA SSTIs in both adults and children. These findings may inform future choices for empiric antibiotic selection. The increased incidence of MSSA infec- tions in adults may support the enhancement of horizontal infection control practices to prevent MSSA transmission or infection resulting from auto inoculation. Future surveillance for trends in MRSA and MSSA infections is needed to develop infection control policies and to optimize choices for empiric therapy for pediatric and adult S. aureus infections.


acknowledgments


Financial support: M.Z.D. received grant support from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health (grant no. K23 AI095361). Potential conflicts of interest: All authors report no conflicts of interest


relevant to this article. Address correspondence to M. Ellen Acree,MD, 2122 Dewey Ave, Evanston,


IL 60201 (ellenacree@gmail.com).


references 1. Lowy FD. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 1998;339:520–532.


MSSA Blood Isolates (n=578) Rifampin No.


(% susceptible) 62 (100.0)


59 (100.0) 65 (100.0) 77 (100.0) 18 (100.0)


Tetracyclineb No.


(% susceptible) 62 (100.0)


58 (98.3) 62 (95.4) 74 (96.1) 17 (94.4)


Ciprofloxacinb No.


(% susceptible) 57 (91.9)


58 (98.3) 62 (95.4) 71 (92.2) 17 (94.4)


Clindamycinb No.


(% susceptible) 47 (75.8)


50 (84.8) 53 (81.5) 65 (84.4) 14 (77.8)


NOTE. MSSA, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Q1, first quarter of the year;


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144