search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
infection control & hospital epidemiology october 2017, vol. 38, no. 10 original article


Incidence of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella Infections in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review


Jennifer McDanel, MS PhD;1,2,3 Marin Schweizer, PhD;1,2,3 Victoria Crabb, BSN MS;2,3 Richard Nelson, PhD;4,5 Matthew Samore, MD;4,5 Karim Khader, PhD;4,5 Amy E. Blevins, MALS;6 Daniel Diekema, MD, MS;1 Hsiu-Yin Chiang, PhD;1 Rajeshwari Nair, MBBS, PhD;1,2 Eli Perencevich, MD, MS1,2,3


background. Despite a reported worldwide increase, the incidence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) Escherichia coli and Klebsiella infections in the United States is unknown. Understanding the incidence and trends of ESBL infections will aid in directing research and prevention efforts.


objective. To perform a literature review to identify the incidence of ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella infections in the United States. design. Systematic literature review.


methods. MEDLINE via Ovid, CINAHL, Cochrane library,NHSEconomic Evaluation Database, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for multicenter (≥2 sites), US studies published between 2000 and 2015 that evaluated the incidence of ESBL-E. coli or ESBL-Klebsiella infections. We excluded studies that examined resistance rates alone or did not have a denominator that included uninfected patients such as patient days, device days, number of admissions, or number of discharges. Additionally, articles that were not written in English, contained duplicated data, or pertained to ESBL organisms from food, animals, or the environment were excluded.


results. Among 51,419 studies examined, 9 were included for review. Incidence rates differed by patient population, time, and ESBL definition and ranged from 0 infections per 100,000 patient days to 16.64 infections per 10,000 discharges and incidence rates increased over time from 1997 to 2011. Rates were slightly higher for ESBL-Klebsiella infections than for ESBL-E. coli infections.


conclusion. The incidence of ESBL-E. coli and ESBL-Klebsiella infections in the United States has increased, with slightly higher rates of ESBL-Klebsiella infections. Appropriate estimates of ESBL infections when coupled with other mechanisms of resistance will allow for the appropriate targeting of resources toward research, drug discovery, antimicrobial stewardship, and infection prevention.


Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1209–1215


Since the late 1980s, infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms have been reported worldwide.1–8 Patients infected with ESBL-producing E. coli or Klebsiella can have poor outcomes due to delays in receiving appropriate antimicrobial therapy and limited treatment options. Strains harboring ESBLs are resistant to third- generation cephalosporins, extended-spectrum penicillins, and monobactams.9,10 Additionally, many ESBL-producing strains of E. coli and Klebsiella demonstrate coresistance to other antimicrobial agents such as fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and tetracyclines.11


Trends among surveillance studies suggest an increase in


the proportion of ESBL-producing strains among isolates collected from E. coli or Klebsiella infections.12–15 However, the incidence of E. coli or Klebsiella infections caused by ESBL-producing strains in the United States is unclear. Knowledge of the incidence and trends of ESBL infections will aid in directing appropriate empiric therapy for patients suspected of having ESBL-E. coli or ESBL-Klebsiella infections and will promote prevention efforts in places with high incidence of these resistant organisms. We performed a systematic literature review to identify the incidence and


Affiliations: 1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; 2. Iowa City Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa;


3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; 4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; 5. Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah; 6. Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. (Present affiliation: Ruth Lilly Medical Library, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana [A.E.B.].).


PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: These data were presented in part at the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2015 Spring Conference in Orlando, Florida, on May 15, 2015.


© 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 0899-823X/2017/3810-0011. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.156 Received March 13, 2017; accepted June 18, 2017; electronically published July 31, 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144