search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
infection control & hospital epidemiology october 2017, vol. 38, no. 10 original article


Structure, Process, and Outcome Quality of Surgical Site Infection Surveillance in Switzerland


Stefan P. Kuster, MD, MSc;1,2,a Marie-Christine Eisenring, CNS, ICP;1,3,a Hugo Sax, MD;1,2 Nicolas Troillet, MD, MSc;1,3,4 Swissnosob


objective. To assess the structure and quality of surveillance activities and to validate outcome detection in the Swiss national surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance program.


design. Countrywide survey of SSI surveillance quality. setting. 147 hospitals or hospital units with surgical activities in Switzerland. methods.


Site visits were conductedwith on-site structured interviews and reviewof a random sample of 15 patient records per hospital: 10 from


the entire data set and 5 from a subset of patients with originally reported infection. Process and structure were rated in 9 domains with a weighted overall validation score, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the identification of SSI.


results. Of 50 possible points, the median validation score was 35.5 (range, 16.25–48.5). Public hospitals (P<.001), hospitals in the Italian- speaking region of Switzerland (P=.021), and hospitals with longer participation in the surveillance (P=.018) had higher scores than others. Domains that contributed most to lower scores were quality of chart review and quality of data extraction. Of 49 infections, 15 (30.6%) had been overlooked in a random sample of 1,110 patient records, accounting for a sensitivity of 69.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.6%–81.7%), a specificity of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.5%–100%), a positive predictive value of 97.1% (95% CI, 85.1%–99.9%), and a negative predictive value of 98.6% (95% CI, 97.7%–99.2%).


conclusions. Irrespective of a well-defined surveillance methodology, there is a wide variation of SSI surveillance quality. The quality of chart review and the accuracy of data collection are the main areas for improvement.


Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1172–1181


Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common hospital-acquired infections; they are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, prolonged length of hospital stay, and increased cost.1–6 Infection surveillance with feedback has been shown to reduce SSI rates.7 Nationwide SSI surveillance has been performed in Switzerland since 2011.8 In line with a broader international trend, SSI rates of each participating hospital have beenmade publicly available since 2014, reinforcing the need for valid data collection. Surveillance methods should be standardized to ensure the quality and reliability of surveillance data.9 The accuracy of the


data depends on the experience, qualifications, training, and awareness of the surveillance staff.10,11 Validation is the only independent means to determine the accuracy of surveillance data; thus, validation is essential in determining the reliability of a SSI surveillance network in which data are aggregated from multiple data collectors and are used for comparisons among hospitals.12,13 Validationmeasures are designed to detect potential sources of


bias. With regard to validation of SSI surveillance, particularly selection bias (methods of patient inclusion), information and detection bias (completion of required medical information), and


Affiliations: 1. Swissnoso - National Center for Infection Control, Bern, Switzerland; 2. Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology,


University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; 3. Service of Infectious Diseases, Central Institute, Valais Hospital, Sion, Switzerland; 4. Services of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.


PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: These data were presented in part at the Fourth International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC) on June 23, 2017, in Geneva, Switzerland aAuthors of equal contribution. bMembers of Swissnoso are (in alphabetical order): Carlo Balmelli, MD, Lugano; Marie-Christine Eisenring, RN, ICP, CNS, Sion; Stephan Harbarth, MD, MS, Geneva; Stefan P. Kuster, MD, MSc, Zurich; Jonas Marschall, MD, MSc, Bern; Virginie Masserey Spicher, MD, Bern; Didier Pittet, MD, MS, Geneva; Christian Ruef, MD, Zurich; Hugo Sax, MD, Zurich; Matthias Schlegel, MD, St. Gallen; Alexander Schweiger, MD, Basel; Nicolas Troillet, MD, MSc, Sion; Andreas F. Widmer, MD, MSc, Basel; Giorgio Zanetti, MD, MSc, Lausanne.


© 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 0899-823X/2017/3810-0006. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.169 Received March 14, 2017; accepted July 11, 2017; electronically published August 22, 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144