search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Microscopy 101


Table 2: Sputter target metals for various applications (indicated by x). Recommendations assume that a 1–2 nm thick film was properly deposited using appropriate equipment.


Sputter Material Tabletop SEM Au


Au/Pd Pt Ir


Cr W Ca


aCarbon deposited to 10 nm thickness by vacuum evaporation or ion-beam sputtering


coater manufacturer may have guidelines for specific targets (that is, sputter time, current setting, vacuum), which may be used a for a “ball park” thickness determination. Also visual evaluation of the film color and opacity can be useful in esti- mating the thickness of the sputtered film. If X-ray microanalysis of the sample is required, select a


coating (target) material that is not present in the sample. Tis should avoid interfering peaks in the X-ray spectrum of the sample. Also consider all the X-ray lines possible from your sample (that is, K-series, L-series, M-series) and from the sputtered film. It must be kept in mind not only what X-ray lines might be present, but also what lines could be enhanced at the electron beam accelerating voltage (kV) to be used in your study. If all possible interferences must be avoided, then classic carbon deposition (evaporation) is the recommended approach to render a non-conductive sample amenable for X-ray microanalysis. The rule of thumb for selecting a sputter target for coat-


ing an SEM specimen is to choose the metal that produces the smallest grain size consistent with capabilities of the SEM available. Thus, Au may be acceptable for a table-top SEM for magnifications below 5000×; Au/Pd and Pt would be useful for general purpose SEM imaging; and Cr or W would be appropriate for high-resolution, high-magnifica- tion imaging with an FE-SEM (Table 2). Once the target metal has been selected, the effort should be to produce the thinnest metal film that mitigates charging effects, ideally in the range of 1–2 nm.


Conclusion Te ease with which sputter coater target metals can be


changed allows for flexibility in preparing SEM specimens for imaging and microanalysis. Targets are available for low- magnification and high-magnification work, and they may be changed to facilitate elemental analysis. Use the metal coating that produces the smallest grain structure consistent with the capabilities of the SEM available. Different sputter targets vary in cost, and some require additional infrastructure such as the increased pumping/vacuum capabilities of a high-resolution sputter coater.


Acknowledgments Te authors thank Jack Vermeulen of Micro to Nano, Haarlem, Netherlands, for helpful discussions.


36


References [1] JI Goldstein et al., Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis, Kluwer/Plenum/Springer, New York, 2003.


[2] DE Newbury et al., Advanced Scanning Electron Micros- copy and X-Ray Microanalysis, Plenum/Springer, New York, 1986.


[3] P Echlin, Handbook of Sample Preparation for Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis, Springer, New York, 2009.


[4] Y Lin and DC Joy, Surf Interface Anal 37 (2005) 895–900.


x x


Research SEM (tungsten)


x x


Research SEM (field emission)


x x x x x


SE Signal Boost


x x x x x x


X-ray Microanalysis


x x


PELCO Vacuum Supplies ®


 NW/KF Vacuum Valves 


NW/KF to ISO-K & CF Flange Adapters


 Vacuum Gauges 


NW/KF Electrical Feedthroughs





Vacuum Evaporation filaments, baskets & boats





Vacuum fluids, oils, grease & leak sealants


Rotary Vane & Dry Scroll Vacuum Pumps


Filters, Adapters & Foreline Traps


Vacuum Hoses, Clamps & Adapters


Microscopy Products for Science and Industry www.tedpella.com sales@tedpella.com 800.237.3526 www.microscopy-today.com • 2019 July


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68