search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Quantifying Polymer Deposition


Table 2: Results from microfluorometry of 20 hair fibers treated for 3min with solutions of 0.1%, 0.01%, and 0.001% polymer. Average values are shown at the bottom: mean (μ), standard deviation (σ), and standard error (σE


). Fiber


Figure 6: Distance scans across the exterior of hair fibers treated with: 0.1% polymer solution (dark blue), 0.01% solution (red), 0.001% solution (green), and control without polymer solution (black).


Results Microfluorometry of the cuticle. Te amount of polymer


deposited on the hair fibers was determined by monitoring the FI obtained from surface scans of the cuticular surface of the hair fibers. To test the analysis system, FI was measured at 800 points along the length of a single hair fiber from each treatment as well as from the control to determine the poly- mer deposition profile along a 3 mm length of the hair fiber (Figure 6). To obtain statistically useful values for the amount of


polymer covering the surface of the hair fibers, FI measure- ments were acquired from each of 20 different hair fibers for each treatment. Table 2 shows results of these microfluorom- etry measurements. Te mean (μ) values of the fluorescent intensities 54.4>23.4>12.0 followed the concentration differ- ences of the polymer solutions: 0.1% > 0.01% > 0.001%. Epi-fluorescent images. To obtain an epi-fluorescent image,


the illuminator directed excitation light onto the specimen by first passing the light through the microscope objec- tive lens that acts as a condenser on the way toward the specimen. Ten the same objective captures the emitted fluorescence. Figure 7 shows typical epi-fluorescent light


micrographs obtained from the treated and con- trol hair fibers. Intensities of the epi-fluorescent images obtained from the hair fibers were consis- tent with the distance scans of Figure 6 and the data of Table 2: the hair fibers treated with the 0.1% polymer solution had the highest FI while those with the 0.001% solution had the lowest. Te FI of the control was barely above background level. Microfluorometry of the cross sections.


Previous microscopy (not shown) of the pathway for diffusion of polymer into hair fibers indicates that molecules enter the hair fibers at the edges between the cuticle cells. At the beginning of the diffusion process intercellular diffusion is the preferred route, predominantly along the non- keratinous regions of the cell membrane complex


28


# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9


10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 µ σ


σE 0.1%


Solution FI


89.63


106.48 55.18 21.33 35.94 99.83 27.7 18.5


26.89 51.05 80.04 73.21 55.77 61.21 35.13 71.08 25.75 27.34 33.09 93.24 54.42 28.51 6.38


0.01% Solution


FI


94.32 49.19 18.68 12.73 21.99 19.43 21.24 6.43


21.82 16.23 27.91 2.97


24.53 20.42 28.14 27.65 10.95 3.77


18.44 22.87 23.49 19.53 4.37


0.001% Solution


FI 5.69


13.96 18.12 4.14 7.32


18.79 10.78 16.85 3.94


18.41 28.56 6.22


17.50 8.27


11.35 10.56 9.54 6.23


10.07 12.74 11.95 6.24 1.40


Control FI


2.09 7.3


3.52 1.78 3.51 2.27 3.05 3.04 1.08 2.72 4


2.02 0.6


3.04 1.79 3.95 0.66 7.12 2.66 3.79 3.00 1.76 0.39


Figure 7: Epi-fluorescent light microscopy images from hair fibers treated with: (A) 0.1%, (B) 0.01%, (C) 0.001% polymer solution, and (D) control (no polymer solution). Image widths=1.4mm.


www.microscopy-today.com • 2019 July


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68