24 INSIGHTS
CHALLENGES The Hertfordshire project is surrounding by general housing, and came up against many objections from residents which have delayed the programme
We came up against a number of challenges on a current project located in the county of Hertfordshire. Our role is as architects up to planning and then as EAs, for 74 new temporary accommodation units located within a conservation area, which is surrounded by trees and general housing. The project involves the expansion of an existing facility, which already houses temporary accommodation, but is no longer fit for purpose. We have been working on this scheme since late 2016, and local objections, in particular from residents, have continually delayed the programme. While supporting the concept, they do not want this type of facility on their doorstep, so they have raised every concern possible – from anti-social behaviour to the appearance of the building and even car parking and traffic, although the individuals making use of the accommodation don’t tend to have access to cars.
Following four pre-application meetings and consultations with neighbours, all manner of surveys – including traffic surveys – were commissioned to alleviate their concerns. We also had to undergo verified views to show how the building would look in its environment in the summer and winter (when the leaves have fallen), so the public could be reassured they wouldn’t be able to see the building from their back gardens.
The design itself had to be robust and low-maintenance with traditional brickwork and render construction – flat roofs and panel systems were out of the question. We also had to include an on-site office facility so the property could be managed on a day- to-day basis.
While this project is still ongoing, it is in complete contrast to another one we are working on, on the south coast in Kent, where speed is the number one priority. The scheme involves three sites, including two brownfield sites of unused garages and one greenfield site.
WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK
Working with our client to get this up and running as quickly and efficiently as possible, we began by looking at how we could adapt existing modular blocks, but are now providing a bespoke modular solution with a volumetric system to deliver the units fast. Just three months in and planning consent is imminent. As with the Hertfordshire scheme, the finish must be robust, to allow for the wear and tear that comes with the rapid churn of residents. Again, we will be using tough materials with the 6 metre x 3 metre units clad in brick before they are delivered to the site for assembly. If asked what advice I would give to another architect when designing for interim accommodation for the homeless, the main thing would be to remember that we are not trying to achieve award-winning architecture. We are trying to solve a problem. It is certainly worth looking at what has been done before to get an idea of what is achievable. It is also important to understand exactly what the local authority’s objectives are, so their requirements are fulfilled. Robustness, speed of delivery and low maintenance are common needs for interim accommodation.
Local authorities have a duty to provide homeless applicants with interim accommodation, however, lack of planning guidance and objections to these schemes hamper the provision of these much-needed facilities. This coupled with fears among the public and the stigma surrounding the type of people who may be housed in these properties, means getting the green light on planning is an ongoing challenge.
While this problem remains, we at Pellings continue to work as effectively as possible with our clients to get temporary households up and running on sites that would otherwise remain dormant. It might not solve the homelessness crisis, but at least interim accommodation can provide a temporary respite.
Nicolas Maari is senior partner and head of architecture at Pellings ADF FEBRUARY 2020
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124
