search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MAY 2019 • COUNTRY LIFE IN BC


Don’t blame the cows for global warming The anti-beef movement has its numbers wrong – eat local to fix the climate


I would like to straighten out some of the errors about beef production and climate change. First, let me state that I am


Viewpoint by Martin Nicoll


an environmentalist who lives completely off the grid with electricity from solar panels. However, I do have a grazing contract with a local rancher. (I am sure Frank Martens uses solar panels to run his irrigation pumps.)


The fundamental cause of climate change is that carbon that has been stored for millions of years is being released into the atmosphere. Let’s follow the carbon in raising beef: The plants pull CO2 out of the atmosphere, the cattle eat the plants and put out CO2 and methane (CH4). After 12 or so years, the methane converts back to CO2 and then back into the plants. Interesting. No stored carbon released. A closed loop.


The downfall of my


argument is that methane is a worse greenhouse gas than CO2. How much worse depends on how you manipulate the numbers. I have seen as low as 8 times and as high as 86 times. The most common trick of the anti-beef crowd is to use the value for a kilogram of


methane, CH4, as a kilogram of CO2. This automatically gives a much higher value since a kilogram of methane has way more molecules (and hence more carbon) than a kilogram of CO2 due to its lower molecular mass.


The moral of this example is to be very skeptical of any values or statistics quoted in articles, mine included. If it is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal, you only need to be slightly skeptical. Here is another example.


Canada is often made out to be a terrible polluter by using CO2 emissions per person. If we doubled our population with the same emissions, would the atmosphere be better off? Why not use emissions per square kilometre? Then, we would look terrific.


Both values are misleading. The best value would probably just be total tonnes emitted. So, if we get rid of all the


cattle, you would get a one time improvement in the amount of methane and then no difference. The real methane problem will be when the permafrost melts and rots. If you wish to criticize


agriculture, concentrate on the amount of fossil fuels that are consumed in producing feed or in transportation. If


you want to minimize your carbon footprint, eat local grass-fed beef. I would like to see a comparison of eating grass- fed beef from your neighbour versus vegetables trucked in from Mexico. (Mind you, with the current slaughter regulations, the government is trying to shut down small farms, maximize animal suffering and use as much fossil fuel as possible. Ironic, isn’t it, that the government will sell you cigarettes, alcohol and now pot, but says it is too dangerous to buy meat from your neighbour without trucking it off for some bureaucrat to look at. I digress.)


Another weakness in my closed-loop argument for carbon and cattle is that carbon is taken out of the loop and permanently stored in the bones of the animals. Perhaps ranchers deserve a carbon credit! (Now don’t get excited – that was a joke!) I’ve never seen any values


but I’m sure the amount is minimal. However, I bet you I could manipulate the numbers, post it on the Internet and get thousands to believe it, just like people believe methane is 86 times worse than CO2. Martin Nicoll doesn’t own a


computer and used Canada Post to mail his contribution to us from Pinatan Lake.


FILE PHOTO


www.OkLandBuyers.ca “Farmers helping farmers with their real estate needs”


5


203 ENDERBY-GRINDROD RD, ENDERBY


15.9 acre hobby farm w/2 bed/1 bath home just outside Enderby. Updated kitchen, unfinished basement framed in for 2 bedrooms, family room. 40x60 Quonset shop, older frame barn. Good perimeter/cross fencing. Reliable water supply. Quick commute to town from this attractive rural property. MLS®10180402 $649,000


PAT DUGGAN


Personal Real Estate Corporation Royal LePage Downtown Realty Ltd. Farm | Ranch | Residential


Bus: 250/545-5371 (24 hr) Cell: 250/308-0938 patduggan@royallepage.ca


Downtown Realty


4007 - 32nd Street, Vernon, BC V1T 5P2 1-800-434-9122 www.royallegpage.ca


Let’s make a deal!


Financial planning for farm families Customized portfolio strategy


  


Farm transition coaching Retirement income planning


Noble Tractor & Equipment is now COUNTRY TRACTOR


The name may be new, but we are still the same friendly folks, in the same locations, here to serve your parts, service and equipment needs.


Staff and management at both our


Armstrong and Kamloops locations will remain the same, and we carry all of the same great product lines to keep your farms productive.


Driediger Wealth Planning


Mark Driediger, CFP, FEA, Senior Wealth Advisor Brent Driediger, BAA, CPA, CMA, CFP, Wealth Advisor www.DriedigerWealthPlanning.com | 604.859.4890 Assante Financial Management Ltd.


Insurance products and services are provided through Assante Estate and Insurance Services Inc. Please visit www.assante.com/legal.jsp or contact Assante at 1-800-268-3200 for information with respect to important legal and regulatory disclosures relating to this notice.


Kamloops 580 Chilcotin Road 250.851.3101 Toll Free 1.888.851.3101


Armstrong 4193 Noble Road 250.546.3141 Toll Free 1.800.661.3141


www.countrytractor.ca


CASE SV1852011, 3420 HRS, 2 SPEED, EH CONTROLS, HYD COUPLER . . .$26,650 MAHINDRA 2565 2016, 65 ENG HP, CAB, 4X4, LDR, ONLY 60 HRS . . . . . . 45,900 MAHINDRA MAX 26 2016, 25.6HP, 4X4, LDR, ONLY 10 HRS . . . . . . . . . . . 17,550 CASE IH MAGNUM 225 2013, 2006 HRS, CVT, 50KM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165,500 IHC 5088 1981, 8500 HRS, 135 PTO HP, CAB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,500 KUBOTA 8540N 2009, 3415 HRS, 76 PTO HP, CAB, 4X4, NARROW . . . . . . 31,500 JD 7410 1997, CAB, 4X4, POWER QUAD, 740 LDR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,500 JD 6403 2006, 5500 HRS, 85 PTO HP, CAB, 4X4, LDR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,500 CASE IH RB455A 4’X5’, TWINE WRAP, NEW, FULL WARRANTY . . . . . . . . . 19,965 CASE IH 541C HYD DENSITY, Q-TURN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,500 JD 348 2012, HYD DENSITY, Q-TURN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,900 CASE IH DC 102 10’4”, 2014, RUBBER ROLLS, HYD HEAD TILT . . . . . . . 23,500 CASE IH DC102 10’4” CUT, 2010, HYD HEAD TILT, RUBBER ROLLS . . . . 18,500 JD 350R FRONT MOUNT DISC MOWER, 11’5” CUT, IMPELLER . . . . . . . . . 22,500 NH 1465 2001, 9’2” CUT, VERY NICE SHAPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,800 MF 220 SERIES II WINDROWER, 1999, 18’ DRAPER HEADER REDUCED . 19,500 BUHLER 1500 HAYLINER ROUND BALE MOVER, HOLDS 8 OF 4’ BALES . 10,800 BRILLION 12’4” CULTIPACKER, CROW FRONT, NOTCH REAR, NEW . . . . . .21,950 WILLSIE HYDRAWEEDER, 3-POINT MOUNTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,950 MAHINDRA MPACT 750S, UTV ONLY 330 MILES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,900


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48