search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INSULATION Addressing critical interfaces


Andrew Mitchell of NBT (Natural Building Technologies) discusses the challenges of achieving design integrity at building interfaces, for insulation or air-tightness


he role of the architect in the design and construction process has changed over the years, with many of the responsibilities that used to sit with the architect now shared between a disparate collection of consultants. The ‘blank spaces’ between their remits have left a gap where there is often a lack of joined-up thinking to ensure that all elements of the project work effectively as a whole.


T


A primary example of the impact of this fragmentation is the critical interfaces between different building envelope elements, particularly structural, acoustic and thermal, (delivering either insulation or airtightness). With the main contractor delegating responsibilities to a multitude of subcontractors, we have developed a construction process where supply chain partners are responsible for their own elements of a complex jigsaw, but are not fully engaged with those responsible for the other pieces of the puzzle. With the architect and the engineer also working independently, and often novated to the principal contractor, there is often no central role to ensure that the interfaces are as robust as possible. As a result, unresolved elements are often ‘discovered’ during the construction process, leading to delays, waste, and the potential for increased costs combined with poorer final results.


The performance gap Advances in building materials and increasingly strict Building Regulations have delivered significant improvements to the performance of the building envelope of contemporary buildings, compared with those built only a handful of decades ago...on paper, at least. We have also seen a wealth of sustainable and renewable materials enter the mainstream of specification, as both architects and their clients recognise that a more environmentally responsible approach to construction can actually reduce the cost of the building rather than add to the


ADF JULY 2019


81


bottom line. Woodfibre insulation is an excellent example of this attitude shift, providing excellent thermal and hygroscopic performance along with carbon ‘lock up’ credentials.


The problem is that elements within the envelope build-up can only deliver their designed performance if the interface is fully integrated in order to prevent thermal bridging and heat loss. If, as is often the case, the interfaces are far less robust and well-detailed than they appear on paper, we lose the opportunity for creating more thermally efficient and airtight buildings, while adding significant construction cost through increased time, increased material waste, and failures that can lead to costly snagging. Worse still, if the physics of the building are not properly understood, totally inappropriate materials may be used, which could lead to overheating in the summer months – or major moisture issues affecting the integrity of the building or the health of the occupant. So, while the specification may add up to excellent


The idea is to align improved design integrity and building performance with a real-world approach to answering buildability issues, time pressures and skills shortages


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100