The most noticeable practical change to the way the firm works is its move to “agile working”

STUDENT ACCOMMODATION Lumis student accommodation at Southgates, Leicester

designers were among the additions to a growing workforce; a sister company Maber Project Planning (offering QS as well as project management) was formed. In the past two decades the firm has seen a lot of activity in the education sector, across schools, colleges and universities, together with more work in historic and cultural buildings.

Although it has strengths in particular sectors, Harris says Maber

has “always and quite deliberately been a general practice,” working with “as many different clients as possible.” He says the business’ resilience is proof of the success of this strategy: “This has enabled the practice to follow rising fortunes of different sectors, and avoiding the worst effects of downturns.” He cites the fact that despite the fact there have been several recessions in the last 35 years, only two redundancies have been made (in the early 90s). The Nottingham HQ now has three teams – the Derby, Leicester and Birmingham counterparts each having one. The London branch is a ‘touchdown’ office, with “only a few staff regularly in and out of the workspace.” While teams are led by senior staff, “job title is much less important than the job they do looking after their team, and the projects and clients they are working with.”

Collaboration A flexible, collaborative approach characterised by staff often working across teams – is evident, feeding into the company maxim of ‘One practice, multiple locations.’ If a new specialism is required on a particular project, says Harris, it tends to be provided by an experienced colleague, deployed alongside a team, and temporarily working in another office. While Nottingham has “the most noticeable sector split,” – industrial and commercial, residential and higher education projects – these are all delivered by staff at other offices too.

The founder Colin Maber initially wanted the firm to work as a co-operative, but, says Harris, a limited liability company turned out to be the order of the day, “to give employees more security of income.” The collaborative aspect persists throughout the work itself though, embodied in the six ‘values’ set in stone by the directors. These include “promoting challenge and accountability,” “expressing appreciation and valuing each other’s work,” “doing what we say we will, when we say,” and “treating each other respectfully and looking for the best in each other.”


Harris sums up the management approach to nurturing positive team working: “Focusing on the relationships as key to good working practice is sometimes hard to explain, but to keep on track we invite 360 degree reviews for the management team on how well we individually deliver against these values.” Systems and software are of course fundamental to supporting this collaboration. “By making communication easier, more versatile and more useful, we promote more interaction, knowledge sharing and involvement,” says Harris. The firm employs Slack (“a kind of Facebook for business”), as well as Zoom video and voice conferencing, Trello (“project post-its on steroids”) and project knowledge hub Salesforce, as well as a custom-built technical info resource Knowledge Base. There is a full time BIM manager, looking after “workflows, processes and standards – not just software, but the real meaning of BIM!”

Starting again at 35 Despite the firm’s successes, with tough trading conditions as well as what Harris describes as a combination of “increasing competition, stop/start projects and decreasing profitability,” a reassessment of the business was called for. “We knew we had to dig deep into the habits and assumptions we had grown up with.” He even admits that “pockets of people were in a rut; not as engaged as they could be,” so the firm decided to emulate start-ups, and “try to harness the infectious energy and investment that they are defined by.” He enthuses about the merits of such firms, where “everyone is focused on a common goal, they jump between roles, and try out different things – they look for innovation, change and growth.” An away day last year helped gauge staff views on how teams could “challenge each other to do better.” Working groups – introduced to be a “creative engine room” now produce ideas presented bi-monthly to the whole management team. The most noticeable practical change to the way the ‘rebooted’ firm works is its move to “agile working,” i.e. staff members being freed to work as flexibly as possible. Harris admits however that “this requires some cultural shift – people can be concerned they are disadvantaged when away from ‘their’ desk, and team leaders can be suspicious work isn’t getting done when people are not in the office.”

The new Leicester office, in a former Victorian shopping arcade, is a test bed for how Maber intends to run things in future – “moving past the anchors that hold you to a desk,” says Harris. “The ‘big’ monitors are scattered around, [and not on every desk], there are a variety of spaces to collaborate, withdraw and be quiet, or be noisy, or prepare food together.” Feedback is “universally positive,” he says. Challenges remain, from the more practical (“too many people have their attention diluted by tasks that could be better distributed to a more specialist support team”), to the macro: “We face an uncertain period politically and economically.” However, with growing amounts of work in the PRS and student residential markets in the Midlands, and busy BIM and landscape architecture teams, the firm remains on a strong footing, the MD asserts. “There is always more to do in the refinement how we work,” says Harris, “but we remain committed to challenging ourselves to stay fresh, hungry and creative.” 


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100