search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FX MACROECONOMICS


inflation firmed, the Fed was feeling more confident about removing some accommodation. By June, opinion frayed. The decline in inflation became more concerning for more Fed officials.


Many have offered to resolve Y el le n ’ s mystery.


They


cite structural factors, like global ization, demographics, and technolog ica l d is r u pt io n s . The arguments are fine and good but


are


beside the point.


These


s t r uct u r a l arguments do not explain the recent decline: why


the July core


PCE deflator stood near 1.8% last


and only 1.4% this past July. It is not


very satisfying to receive a long- term structural explanation for a short-term phenomenon.


Some economists have taken a look at the basket of goods and services and found that air travel, apparel, and used car prices have dragged the core measure lower. Te appropriate level of analysis is


14 FX TRADER MAGAZINE October - December 2017


speech last week. He focused on the factors that seemed to have broken down the old relationship between economic activity


and prices. Borio


offers a clear and compelling explanation: Globalization. The establishment of global value chains and the entry of low-cost producers and their cheap labor into the market


Yellen sounds confident that over time, wages will rise, and businesses can be expected to pass on higher costs to consumers


not the integration of China and the former Soviet Union into the market economy.


It is not about


the Baby Boomers retiring, or unfolding of Moore’s Law.


The chief economist at the BIS, Borio offered his take in a


The Financial Times’ Davies see Bario at odds with Yellen. Davies makes it sound that protocol prevented Bario


Yellen directly for not accepting the


suggest


a rg u me n t s . But


from criticizing structural we


Bario


and Yellen are


at different things. is


interest rates and


months.


Moreover, the a g r e em en t between Yellen and Bario is of


greater significance. The policy prescription is the same, though they arrive at it somewhat differently.


Yellen argues


that the transitory nature of inflation depressants suggest the Fed should look past them and maintain its course of gradually removing accommodation.


Ba rio argues tha t the


looking Bario


at the long- term


looking decline


inflation.


Yellen is looking at the last


several


economy is at the center of his explanation.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70