This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Address to Jessup Competitors


every court. The professional opportunities you have opened up for yourselves by participating in this competition are likely to offer you great things. You have chosen a field of specialisation which offers a chance to shape the world and the conflicts which burden it. Former Jessup com- petitors argue before the International Court of Justice. They are in prominent roles all over the world as diplomats, ministers, teachers, judges and practising lawyers. In Singapore, as Su- preme Court Justices; in Georgia, as Minister of Justice; even as General Counsel of Microsoft, who bought his first computer to participate in the Jessup. You will meet each other in unex- pected professional places throughout your ca- reers. You will face real problems, like the moot problems but different, all your lives, serving the cause of peace and security; and it is not fanciful to hope that the friendships initiated here will make resolving those problems easier.


38


As you rise in your professions, do not forget that lawyers are given great privileges and are often quite prosperous as a result. Think of those who cannot afford a lawyer. Some of them will have a good claim, notably against the state, but through lack of a legally-trained advocate, their voices will go unheard and they will not prevail. Consider acting for them without fee. There are organisations which serve those who need guid- ance. There are countries which need guidance.


In America and in the United Kingdom, we call such work pro bono. In other countries, it may be called pro deo. In some countries, it is little known. I am proud to be the head of my firm’s pro bono practice. Hundreds of my colleagues devote some time in a professional year to doing some pro bono work. I encourage each of you to devote a small part of your professional time to pro bono work. It helps to train, it helps to find new colleagues, it motivates the non-law- yers with whom we work, and once in a while it can make the world a better place. Last, but not to be forgotten, is the truth that pro bono work


is now a factor of competition with other law- yers. Recall, in pursuing this activity, the words of Aristides to Themistocles when seeking to settle a conflict between their Greek city states in face of a common external challenge: “Let us enter upon a safe and honourable dispute, com- peting with each other for the preservation of Greece.”1


I hope that you in your future practices will “in safe and honourable dispute” compete with each other for pre-eminence in pro bono ef- fort. This contest, the Jessup International Law Moot, is indeed a safe and honourable dispute. You are coming to the other side of the moun- tain of academic and practical effort which a le- gal education entails. Congratulations on getting so far so quickly. I salute you as the future lead- ers of your profession.


.


Ian Forrester, QC, is a Partner in the White & Case Brussels office and head of the Firm’s Global Pro Bono Practice. Mr. Forrester practices European law, litigating trade, competition and regulatory cases before the European Courts, and has particular experience in due process and human rights cases.


For more information about White & Case’s so- cial responsibility initiative, please visit the 2011 Social Responsibility Review at srreview2011. whitecase.com.


1 For when Eurybiades was deliberating to desert the isle


of Salamis, and the galleys of the barbarians putting out by night to sea surrounded and beset the narrow passage and islands, and nobody was aware how they were en- vironed, Aristides, with great hazard, sailed from Ægina through the enemy’s fleet; and coming by night to Them- istocles’ tent, and calling him out by himself; “If we have any discretion,” said he, “Themistocles, laying aside at this time our vain and childish contention, let us enter upon a safe and honourable dispute, vying with each other for the preservation of Greece.” (Plutarch’s Lives,


Volume 1 of 2) . ILSA Quarterly » volume 20 » issue 4 » May 2012


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96