This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Court Watch


to acquire, transfer, and use anti-aircraft missiles; and (4) conspiracy to provide material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization. In No- vember 2010, Thai authorities extradited Bout to New York where he was subsequently arrested, tried, and convicted of all four counts.


Bout graduated from Moscow’s Military Institute of Foreign Languages, a feeder program for Rus- sia’s military intelligence arm, and then spent time as a military translator in Mozambique and Angola. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Bout began building an air-freighting empire by purchas- ing and refurbishing old military cargo planes. He filled the planes with an array of goods – some legal, some not – and typically registered them in countries like Equatorial Guinea to avoid having to disclose his clients or the contents of his cargo.


12


Throughout the 1990s Bout deservedly acquired the nickname “Merchant of Death” due to his willingness and ability to supply large shipments of weapons to hostile corners of the world.


By the mid-2000s, Bout’s support of Charles Tay- lor’s ruthless reign of terror in Liberia had landed him on the U.S. Treasury Department’s Specially Designated Nationals list, effectively freezing all his assets and prohibiting any transactions with U.S. citizens. Interpol had issued warrants for his arrest and the United Nations (UN) Security Coun- cil had passed resolutions condemning his viola- tions of arms embargoes in Angola, thus heavily restricting his travel. But because of his alleged ties with Russian intelligence, Bout remained in- sulated from prosecution in Moscow.


In November 2007, the DEA decided to go after Bout. Since the laws governing the sale of arms vary from nation to nation they choose instead to employ a terrorism-related ruse that had recent- ly been successful in netting another infamous weapons trafficker, Monzer al-Kassar.


Carlos Sagustume, an undercover informant working for the DEA, approached Bout’s busi- ness associate, Andrew Smulian, and asked if the


Russian was interested in selling a large cache of weapons to representatives of the FARC, a U.S.- designated terrorist group. Bout was interested, but unbeknownst to him, the FARC representa- tives he thought he was doing business with were undercover DEA agents.


Over the next several months, the DEA worked in conjunction with Dutch, Danish, and Romanian authorities in obtaining judicial authorization for wiretaps used to record the meetings that took place in those countries between the undercover operatives and Smulian, as well as phone calls be- tween Smulian and Bout. The recorded conversa- tions provided more than enough evidence for an arrest warrant, but unless authorities could draw him out of Moscow and into a country with a fa- vorable extradition treaty with the U.S. they would be unable to execute it.


In February 2008, the undercover informants were finally able to convince Bout to fly to Thailand to finalize the deal in person. During a meeting in Bangkok on March 6, authorities recorded Bout expressly agreeing to sell weaponry that included armor-piercing rockets, combat helicopters, and surface-to-air missiles. They also captured Bout confirming his understanding that the weapons were going to be used by the FARC against Amer- icans in Columbia. Shortly after making these statements, Thai police officers stormed the con- ference room and arrested Bout.


Despite Thailand and the U.S. having a favorable extradition treaty, it took almost two years of legal wrangling, and significant diplomatic pressure, be- fore Bout was extradited. He arrived in November 2010, and was charged in the Southern District of New York with conspiracy to kill U.S. nationals and officers and employees of the United States, conspiracy to provide anti-aircraft missiles, and conspiracy to provide material support to a desig- nated foreign terrorist organization.


Bout’s trial began on October 12, 2011. His defense argued that Bout had only been playing along with


ILSA Quarterly » volume 20 » issue 4 » May 2012


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96