This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
50 | SPECIAL REPORT | FUNDING AND FINANCE


"VCs are terrified that there will be a freeze on fees, as the gravy days won’t last for very long as revenues become soaked up by institutional changes and improvements"


ABOVE: Nolan Smith, HEFCE’s Head of Finance and Investment


of new pledges – fell by £81m overall, but this was offset by median incomes rising, partly due to large awards and other universities increasing the funds they secured. This result in part seems to have been prompted by greater moves to stimulate engagement – with an additional 44 fundraising staff having joined the sector in 2012/13. Donor numbers correspondingly rose to 223,000, with the pool of addressable alumni swelling from 9.3 million, up from 8.5 million. However, dependence on giving does have


its limitations. Charity is seldom costless – with £80m invested by universities in their fundraising activities, primarily on staffing costs. At LSBU, giving is regarded as a source of top-up income, rather than an independent stream. “The purpose of fundraising is to enhance what other forms of funding are able to provide,” emphasises Simmons. Ross-CASE’s own measures also possess certain


drawbacks which, Simmons believes, do not fully reveal the full scale of charitable support across the sector – interactions which possess significant value, although they are rather harder to quantify. “There are other types of support which are very important – alumni and other supporters mentoring and speaking to students, offering work placements and recruiting students,” he says. “Sadly, the Ross-CASE survey does not reflect this kind of giving, which does a disservice both to the providers of this kind of support and the development offices which work hard to secure it.” Giving across the sector is also imbalanced, with the Russell Group making up 72% of contactable alumni making gifts in 2012/2013. “The Russell Group recruit, on average, students


from wealthier backgrounds. Until there are real improvements in social mobility in the UK, it is inevitable that those institutions will therefore,


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74