W: www.ie-today.co.uk


so that they can reach their full potential.” A recent report issued by the Centre for Market Reform of Education agrees, claiming that governmental obsession with equivalency and “comparability of outcomes” could potentially mar progress, and that diversity, alongside the proper incentives for growth, should be sustained amongst the various boards. One recent success in this regard is the IGCSE


ABOVE: Mark Anderson, MD of Pearson


are showing a great deal of interest in,” explains Kirk. “ISEB certainly thinks that online testing will be an important area for development in the years ahead, and believes it is leading the way.” The largest awarding organisation in the UK,


Pearson offers GCSE and A-level certification, alongside vocational BTECs and numerous other forms of training. Managing Director Mark Anderson concurs on the necessity for exam boards to adapt. “It’s vital that we review our education system and its qualifications on a regular basis, so that we continue to offer young people the standard of education they need in order to succeed and excel throughout their lives.” Anderson believes that the impact of the latest


GCSE revisions on schools will vary. Those who were formerly advocates of modular assessment will need to make more adjustments, whereas others may find the new system allows greater freedom, although it could also create challenges around tracking the progress of candidates. Employing benchmarks can help achieve this, claims


Anderson, and should allow stakeholders (including employers, universities, students, parents and teachers) to convert and compare past and present exam grades. “OFQUAL are currently puting together a report following a consultation on their recommendations for ensuring that current standards on grading are taken forward,” Anderson details. “Our preferred approach would be to use statistical information to link the award of the new grades to current grades.” One radical form of standardisation would be to


consolidate the UK’s exam boards, and to introduce a single body – a measure often proposed by critics. “It is important that we maintain choice in our exam system, and incentivise innovation to ensure that the UK leads the pack in education,” says Anderson. “Exam boards do not compete on the level of


difficulty or standard of our papers, but we do compete on the quality of the offer we present to schools, as well as on how well we prepare and support them to meet the needs of their students,


qualification offered by Cambridge International Examinations, which works with over 10,000 schools in 160 countries, and is often favoured by UK independents. The number of subjects offered – over 70 – is diverse, and include the social sciences, creative, technical and vocational themes. “Cambridge IGCSE is actually the world’s most popular qualification for 14- to 16-year-olds,” says Peter Monteath, the organisation’s Regional Director for the UK and Ireland. The standard is often used to prepare students for the progression to further education and, rather than a modular format, has maintained a linear structure, with exams at the end of each two-year course. Other key differences between IGCSE and a


standard UK GCSE are its culturally neutral content and a degree of independence from regulatory intervention, since it sits outside the UK system. This has resulted in greater consistency and stability in the IGCSE structure – qualities valued by many educators. Monteath argues that the qualification is commonly regarded as a “global academic currency” – one which could put candidates on an equal footing with other global citizens. The numbers of pupils obtaining the


qualifications is certainly significant, with some 500,000 multinational entries made across all subjects each year. Despite this popularity, the 2017 performance tables indicating the success of schools teaching the new style GCSE will partially exclude IGCSE – which could cause some educators to temporarily drop in official rankings. English, English Literature and Mathematics are


all affected, although IGCSE expect this omission to be short-lived. “We can apply for performance table inclusion after the first year of examining the reformed GCSEs – and we will do so,” responds Monteath. “We are already developing new specifications of the first round of subjects to undergo examination in the UK GCSE system, and we will submit these for re-inclusion in performance tables in 2018. Some independent schools have told us that they will simply use whichever qualification they feel is best suited to their students, regardless of their inclusion in performance tables. For other schools, performance tables are clearly of importance.” With the sector keenly observing how each exam


board tailors its proposition to comply with OFQUAL, the endorsement of schools will ultimately determine whether their revamps will graduate with honours. iE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58