This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
washingtonscene


LEGISLATIVE NEWS THAT AFFECTS YOU Changes Coming


The House and Senate defense bills reject many of the administration’s proposed TRICARE fee hikes, but some pharmacy copayment increases are coming, despite House efforts to limit them.


T


he chart on pages 36-37 sum- marizes many of the key differences between the versions of the FY 2013


Defense Authorization Bill approved by the House (H.R. 4310) and the Senate Armed Services Committee (S. 3254). Both bills effectively would kill most


of the Pentagon-proposed TRICARE fee hikes, at least for the next fiscal year.  Beneficiaries age 65 and older won’t see any enrollment fee for TRICARE For Life (TFL).  Beneficiaries under age 65 won’t see any TRICARE Standard enrollment fee or any increase in the Standard deductible.  Beneficiaries under age 65 will see only a 3.6-percent increase in their TRICARE Prime enrollment fee as of Oct. 1 — the same percentage increase as the 2012 COLA, thanks to the COLA cap we won in the FY 2012 Defense Authorization Act.  No beneficiaries will have their TRI- CARE fees means-tested. These decisions in the FY 2013 De-


fense Authorization Bill could be revis- ited at the end of the year if Congress fails to reverse current sequestration law that would cut another $60 billion from the FY 2013 defense budget as of Janu- ary 2013. MOAA is urging Congress to act now to avoid that huge cut. There will be some increases in TRI- CARE pharmacy copayments, and the main issue is how large the hikes will be. That’s where the House and Senate bills take significantly different approaches.


The Senate bill is silent on the phar- macy copayment issue. Because cur- rent law gives the secretary of defense authority to set pharmacy copayments, the Senate bill silently endorses the DoD- proposed plan to more than double co- payments later this year and triple them over the next five years. The problem the Senate Armed Ser- vices Committee faced in stopping the proposed pharmacy copayment hikes lies in Senate budget rules that require the committee to find other offsetting cuts in either military retirement, survivor ben- efits, or other TFL benefits. Why? Because the offset law applies


to so-called “mandatory spending” pro- grams, and that includes any benefit fund- ed through a trust fund — which TFL is. When DoD proposed higher pharmacy


copayments for all beneficiaries, includ- ing TFL-eligibles, it reduced the budget for TFL spending by the government — with the difference made up by the assumed rev- enues from higher copayments. To reduce or bar the copayment hikes, the committee would have to replace the lost revenue by increasing government spending on TFL. And that requires an offsetting spending cut. The Senate didn’t want to identify an offset — which meant letting DoD leaders double and triple pharmacy copayments. The House thought those copayment


increases were so bad they came up with an alternative proposal that did three things:


AUGUST 2012 MILITARY OFFICER 33


Keep Up-to-Date Subscribe to MOAA’s weekly Legislative Up- date at www.moaa .org/email to get the latest on the FY 2013 Defense Authorization Bill and other legisla- tion that affects you and your family.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96