JURISDICTION REPORT: UKRAINE
PROTECTING IP RIGHTS IN UKRAINE
Oleksandr Mamunya Vasil Kisil & Partners
It seems obvious that IP rights are worthless if they are not protected by the holder. It is also true that the range of available procedures and remedies and their efficiency have a large influence on the actual value of IP assets in a certain jurisdiction. Tis chapter briefly describes the procedures and remedies for IP protection available in Ukraine.
Litigation
Litigation is most frequently used for the purposes of IP rights protection in Ukraine. Te above legal tool has its local peculiarities summarised below.
IP cases are normally considered by the Ukrainian civil or commercial courts; however, in some cases, administrative courts shall also be competent. Cease and desist letters or any other pre-litigation measures are not required to initiate the IP court action. Preliminary injunction is available in IP matters either before initiation of court proceedings or within pending litigation cases.
In the vast majority of IP matters in Ukraine, the claims are filed for: termination of IP infringement; compensation for damages resulting from IP infringement; cancellation of a trademark registration/patent; early termination of a trademark registration on the basis of non-use; recognition of a well-known trademark in Ukraine; patent extension; invalidation of an IP-related agreement; cancellation of an application-related decision of the Ukrainian PTO (such cases should be considered by the administrative court); and termination of unfair competition in the IP domain.
In most IP-related court proceedings an expert opinion is requested. Te questions of, inter alia, similarity of trademarks, compliance of a trademark/patent with conditions of registrability/patentability should be considered by specially certified experts, appointed by judge. Tree levels of appeals are formally available; however, in fact, only two of them may be effectively used.
Notably, though Ukraine is not a case law jurisdiction, normally the lower courts are guided by jurisprudence of the higher courts in IP matters.
Administrative procedures
In addition to litigation, administrative procedures may be applied to protect IP rights: at the customs border by the State Customs Service of Ukraine; in the sphere of competition by the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine; and to well-known marks by the Ukrainian PTO.
To obtain the IP rights protection at the customs border, one should register the IP object with the customs registry. Upon registration, the State
www.worldipreview.com
Customs Service will suspend customs clearance of goods containing the registered object, unless otherwise agreed by the rights holder. In the event the IP infringement is confirmed by the court and/or respective expert, the infringing goods should be seized and destroyed. If the IP infringement has not been proved, the IP rights holder should compensate the customs authorities and the importer/exporter.
Under Ukrainian law, only copyright and related rights, trademarks, industrial designs and geographical indications may be registered with the customs authorities. Patents for inventions and utility models may not.
To enjoy IP rights protection from the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine, one should file an application for termination of unfair competition. Tis protection may be provided against trademark, trade name and commercial name infringements. It can result in fines, compensation and seizure of infringing products.
Te Ukrainian PTO can protect rights using its special authority to recognise well-known marks. A mark may be recognised as well known by the PTO’s Appellate Chamber as of certain date (usually, in the past) on application. Te well-known status of a mark secures much broader legal protection in Ukraine and strengthens the IP rights holder’s standing in other IP proceedings.
Criminal proceedings
Criminal proceedings may be initiated against IP infringement upon the relevant statement of the IP rights holder or by the police/prosecutor itself. A criminal IP infringement must be intentional and cause major damages (the amount of damages is not fixed and depends on subsistence level; currently, this means damages of more than €1,000). Under Ukrainian law, a legal entity is a civil plaintiff in a criminal case. Moreover, only individuals (or relevant officials of legal entities) may be criminally liable.
Sanctions range from a fine to imprisonment (with seizure of infringing goods and production facilities), depending on the extent of the criminal offence.
IP infringement that is not considered criminal may be prosecuted by the police as an administrative offence of IP rights, which may be punished by a fine and the seizure of infringing goods and facilities.
Oleksandr Mamunya is a senior attorney at Vasil Kisil & Partners. He can be contacted at:
mamunya@vkp.kiev.ua
World Intellectual Property Review March/April 2011 63
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76